Democrats will win Presidential election of 2016?
Debate Rounds (3)
I don't care if a Republican, Democrat, or Independent argues against me as long as you have an open mind. I want to debate with someone who is not stubborn because they want a certain political party to win, but because they have facts and opinions to back up their statements.
1."ased upon the legislation that was voted on by the American people the policy's that were passed favored the Democrats, therefore the American people elected Republican representatives, but voted Democrat on policy's"
The only problem with that statement is that although the American public supports a majority of democrat principles they fail to support the affordable care act which has remained unpopular.Seeing as republicans exploited the unpopularity of the law to win the presidential election. Although I personally supported the Affordable Care act most of America does not. Thus the American public does not fully support the democratic agenda.
2."The mid-term election has a substantial difference in the amount of people who turn out compared to the presidential. Many Americans didn't even know there was an election in November, but this is not the case of the presidential election"
The turnout rate between presidential elections and midterm elections is between 5 and 10 percent difference which with the landslide victories of Republicans may not make as big a difference as you think. Also Americans did know their was midterm elections. All you needed to do is turn on the news for 5 seconds.
3.first off, the Democrats will receive the votes of the majority of the Latin-American community with President Obama's new executive order the Latin-American community no longer sees President Obama and the Democrat party that President Obama represents as the "Deporter in Chief." Once these people become citizens some will be looking to pay the Democrats.
the effect of the Latin American communities will be felt in the 2020 and 2024 when redistricting is done in the south to fight against gerrymandering in the south and voter id laws that still snuff the ability of minorities to effect the electoral college in the South
4.After the Democrats substantial defeat Democratic Nation Committee is looking at why they were defeated so badly.
This unfortunately requires that the democrats are able to remedy their problems in 2 years may or may not happen. Although thy may be able to accomplish these lofty goals it is far from certain.
BIPARTISANSHIP676 forfeited this round.
sidewinder forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Tie. Both forfeited the final round, thus balancing conduct. S&G - Tie. Neither had any major grammar or spelling errors. Arguments - Con. While both sides presented strong cases, Con's final arguments were left standing unchallenged by Pro. Pro needed to overcome the challenges raised by Con and failed to do so by forfeiting the final round. Due to this reason, Con wins arguments. Sources - Tie. Neither utilized sources in this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.