The Instigator
Raymond123
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
tmar19652
Con (against)
Winning
19 Points

Did Al Quada fly planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
tmar19652
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/12/2013 Category: News
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,218 times Debate No: 30179
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (5)

 

Raymond123

Pro

September eleventh, 2001. When the World Trade Center fell and the Pentagon was hit. Al Quada did fly planes into the buildings and it was NOT a government job.
tmar19652

Con

Actually, al-Qaeda organized the attacks, not "Al Quada" as you stated

http://en.m.wikipedia.org...
Debate Round No. 1
Raymond123

Pro

They might of organized the attacks, but they also carried them out. They had no help from the inside.
tmar19652

Con

You said that "Al Quada" orchestrated the attack, but i proved you wrong by showing that al-Qaeda carried out the attack. Nothing in the resolution states that I have to prove that it was a government job, I just had to prove that "al-quada" did not carry out the attacks.
Debate Round No. 2
Raymond123

Pro

Raymond123 forfeited this round.
tmar19652

Con

Vote Con!
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by tmar19652 4 years ago
tmar19652
Bull, you spelled the resolution wrong, that's why you lost.
Posted by Raymond123 4 years ago
Raymond123
I do humbly apologize for not posting in time. If I were to post in time, Con would not have anything to come back. I think I shall start this one again.
Posted by Deadlykris 4 years ago
Deadlykris
When all the evidence is considered, and none hidden or ignored, then the truth of the official story is clear.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by likespeace 4 years ago
likespeace
Raymond123tmar19652Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con ran an argument based on a spelling error by Pro. Pro did not defend his position, but rather forfeited. Thus, arguments and conduct to Con.
Vote Placed by 1Devilsadvocate 4 years ago
1Devilsadvocate
Raymond123tmar19652Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Cheap shot.
Vote Placed by Heineken 4 years ago
Heineken
Raymond123tmar19652Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by YYW 4 years ago
YYW
Raymond123tmar19652Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Here I was expecting a 9/11 truther debate, and it was just a spelling error which resulted in the loss... oh well. Conduct to CON because PRO forfeited, sources for obvious reasons. Wikipedia > nothing.
Vote Placed by Subutai 4 years ago
Subutai
Raymond123tmar19652Tied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: FF. Nice semantics con.