Diego Maradona is a better Soccer Player than Pele.
Debate Rounds (3)
Looking at the positions they played in, Maradona was an attacking midfielder, while Pele was an out-and-out striker. Different positions require them to play different roles in the game. To say that Pele lacked the dribbling skills is premature, as most of the time, those skills of his were not required in his role of a main striker, and Maradona had more chances as an attacking midfielder to display his dictionary of skills.
Turning our focus entirely to Pele. Being an out and out striker, his job on the pitch was the score goals. Fulfilling your role on the pitch then, makes you a good player. Pele has a goal-scoring average of 0.924 per game, which means that he almost certainly scores every single game. I feel that, this itself, speaks aloud the caliber Pele had as a player.
My last point in Round 1 would be to argue against your point of 'Hand of God', giving Maradona bonus points for being a better player. Obviously, the use of the hand is against the Law of Football, therefore, I don't see why cheating, and denying that he cheated (which he admitted around 10 years later), would make him a better footballer.
The best way to determine that would be in a 1 on 1 soccer match, full pitch. Diego Maradona would destroy Pele because of his general ability to pass his opponent (Pele) and run the ball up the pitch and score, as there is no goal keeper. What would Pele do? Stand in the offence and wait for the ball to somehow make it's way up to his end. If the ball did find it's way to Pele, then only would Pele only beat Maradona at that point in time.
Determining this argument another way, such as overall stats, would not be accurate as their could have been many, many factors that contributed to the accumulated stats for both players.
I finish this argument by saying, Pele would only beat Diego Maradona in a scoring contest, however moving the ball to the offence is more important than scoring.
As to who the better player was, I am sure different people have different judgement. However, to put it in black-and-white, evidences must be shown, which is why I brought up stats to back my argument. Statistically, Pele was the better goal-scorer. Adding on to the goal-scoring stats, Pele also had 4349 assists as compared to Maradona's 3456 assists. I strongly believe that assists are one of the few main elements to objectify the role of an attacking midfielder, and even in this aspect, Pele excels over Maradona.
Therefore, I end of Round 2 of my argument by saying that, the only way to compare players would be with their stats, and Pele appears to be the better player, statistically.
blackkill56 forfeited this round.
debator89 forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.