The Instigator
rockcityboy
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Blade-of-Truth
Con (against)
Winning
20 Points

Disney Channel Sucks!!

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Blade-of-Truth
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/2/2014 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,242 times Debate No: 62566
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (14)
Votes (4)

 

rockcityboy

Pro

It sucks!!!!
Blade-of-Truth

Con

The debate resolution is clear: Disney Channel Sucks!!

Pro will be arguing that Disney channel sucks.
I, Con, will be arguing that Disney channel doesn't suck.

Since Pro is making an affirmative claim that goes against the status quo, the BOP (Burden of Proof) is fully on him to show that Disney Channel does indeed suck. If I am able to defeat any of his arguments, then I rightfully win this debate.

At this point, Pro has done nothing more than make an unsubstantiated claim that Disney sucks. Claims of this nature require proof though in order to be found valid. Otherwise he is just making unjustified claims which hold no bearing in our actual reality.

I can just as easily say that Water sucks, but without providing evidence or justifying my position, no-one has any reason to accept my claim as valid.

This is the case here, where Pro has made a claim without providing any evidence, justification, or proof to maintain his position on the resolution (meaning he needs to prove that the claims he makes are valid).

Since there is nothing to rebut at this point, I will return the floor to Pro and wait as he responds with actual evidence supporting his claims.

I wish the best of luck to Pro in this debate and thank the audience, I now return the floor to Pro.
Debate Round No. 1
rockcityboy

Pro

rockcityboy forfeited this round.
Blade-of-Truth

Con

My opponent has forfeited Round 2.

Since there have been no valid arguments presented by Pro, which is required for him to maintain his BOP, there is nothing for me to extend.

I will allow Pro to present his final arguments before I present my own. I thank the audience for their patience and now return the floor to Pro.
Debate Round No. 2
rockcityboy

Pro

rockcityboy forfeited this round.
Blade-of-Truth

Con

My opponent has forfeited his final round.

Since Pro did nothing to affirm the resolution other than making an unproven claim, I rightfully don't even need to present an argument. He failed to maintain his BOP and therefore automatically gives the win to me, as it is his duty, above all else, to affirm the resolution.

I will still present a few arguments, for the sake of at-least earning myself argument points aside from conduct points.

Since this resolution involves Disney Channel as a whole, I will share some shows from the Disney Channel which were given awards over the years, thus showing the awesomeness of these shows and in effect, the awesomeness of the channel as a whole.

I. Even Stevens (1999 - 2003)

7 wins, 19 nominations

Won, BAFTA Children's Award 2002

Won, Daytime Emmy 2003

Won, Young Artist Award 2001, 2002, 2003, & 2004

http://www.imdb.com...

II. That's so Raven (2003 - 2007)

14 wins, 27 nominations

(I'm just going to include the links to these awards instead of actually posting them all, this is beneficial both in regards to space and time restraints)

http://www.imdb.com...

III. The Suite life of Zack and Cody (2005 - 2008)

9 wins, 21 nominations

http://www.imdb.com...

IV. Opponent lacks any proof affirming his position

Anyone can see the list of Disney shows and there awards easily by looking at the following link:
http://www.imdb.com...

My opponent has completely failed to show any evidence justifying his claim.

I thank the audience for their patience.

Debate Round No. 3
14 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by jacob15 2 years ago
jacob15
Disney Chanel is the best
Posted by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
I'm a dual major in my senior level of undergrad work. I found the time to post these rounds. All I hear are excuses!!

Lol, just busting your chops. Next time, I do suggest better time management though when partaking in debates that have timed rounds.
Posted by rockcityboy 2 years ago
rockcityboy
homework got in mah way again
Posted by Jonbonbon 2 years ago
Jonbonbon
Leaving unnecessarily long RFD's like yeaaaa
Posted by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
It happens. For me, I always prefer debates that have a 72 hour response time. That way, the opponent usually always has a chance to respond. Just food for thought whenever you create your next debate. Good luck in the final round.
Posted by rockcityboy 2 years ago
rockcityboy
aww man I missed the time
Posted by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
Hahaha, I'm happy someone else knows what's good with all those leaks lately. Check your inbox.
Posted by Mikal 2 years ago
Mikal
just link a pic of the arianna grande nude leaks and you win Addison lol
Posted by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
okay
Posted by rockcityboy 2 years ago
rockcityboy
Post response
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
rockcityboyBlade-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by Jonbonbon 2 years ago
Jonbonbon
rockcityboyBlade-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro forfeited. Pro added exclamation marks at the end of his only sentence, which is less grammatically correct than the sentences Blade-of-Truth wrote. Also it reminds me of invsibledeity, and I never want to be reminded of invisibledeity. Con made arguments that pretty much covered everything. Con used sources. Thus con gets a full 7 point win.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
rockcityboyBlade-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by Mikal 2 years ago
Mikal
rockcityboyBlade-of-TruthTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: ff