The Instigator
Zendayalover156
Pro (for)
Winning
15 Points
The Contender
Hiphopforever
Con (against)
Losing
11 Points

Disney Channel is better than Carttoon Network

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 7 votes the winner is...
Zendayalover156
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/25/2014 Category: TV
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 894 times Debate No: 44592
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (7)
Votes (7)

 

Zendayalover156

Pro

First round for acceptance.

Are you in?
Hiphopforever

Con

Glacaim do d"shl"n
Debate Round No. 1
Zendayalover156

Pro

Disney channel is better than Carttoon network because the shows teaches you about something in life. For example the show Shake it Up teaches you about best friends in situations and being a dancer on a tv show is hard work. Another example is Good Luck Charlie because if you watch it towards the end of the show Teddy Duncun makes a video diary for her little sister Charile. Shes usually telling you what went wron for something so it teaches you anout life lessons and difficult situations. Another thing I like to add is that most Disney Channel commercials says something about Friends for Change or eating healthy and staying fit
Hiphopforever

Con

Is Cartoon Network l"n n"os fearr n" Disney Channel mar ba mhaith buachaill" agus cail"n" beag teilif"se chun f"achaint ar agus nach bhfuil rud "igin a fhoghlaim. Agus nach bhfuil an chuid is m" buachaill" agus cail"n" ag iarraidh a bheith suim acu i Disney L"ir"onn cos"il Croith s" Suas n" "dh m"r Charlie

Translation: Cartoon Network is a lot better than Disney Channel because little boys and girls want to watch tv and not learn something. And most boys and girls do not want to be interested in Disney shows like Shake it Up or Good Luck Charlie
Debate Round No. 2
Zendayalover156

Pro

I would like to thank my oppenent for competing with me and trying her best. Also she did a very good job translating what she did. Vote for me
Hiphopforever

Con

Ba mhaith liom ach a ghabh"il le mo ch"ile comhraic a dh"anamh an d"osp"ireacht seo tarl"

Translation: I just want to thank my opponent for making this debate happen
Debate Round No. 3
7 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Posted by DudeStop 3 years ago
DudeStop
And also some words cannot be translated... Known fact!
Posted by DudeStop 3 years ago
DudeStop
@PP:

And why can't you?
Posted by PeriodicPatriot 3 years ago
PeriodicPatriot
T" br"n orm, ach n" f"idir leat glaoch cain"al teilif"se i gceist do na p"ist" oideachais. B"odh a fhios agam nuair a fhaigheann t" roinnt tuiscint coiteann.

Translation: I'm sorry, but you can't call a TV channel meant for kids educational. Let me know when you get some common sense.
Posted by PeriodicPatriot 3 years ago
PeriodicPatriot
Here is what it should be:

Translated text: just want to be caught "my ch il" fighting together to dh "to MAKE the" OSP "Debating this to happen"

Original text: Ba mhaith liom ach a ghabh"il le mo ch"ile comhraic a dh"anamh an d"osp"ireacht seo tarl"

Translated text: accept your d "SHL" n

Original text: Glacaim do d"shl"n

Translated text: Cartoon Network is l "nn" better than the "Disney Channel as a boy wants" reputable "n" little teilif "se to f" and does not regard a thing "to some to learn. And is not the m" winning

Original text: Cartoon Network l"n n"os fearr n" Disney Channel mar ba mhaith buachaill" agus cail"n" beag teilif"se chun f"achaint ar agus nach bhfuil rud "igin a fhoghlaim. Agus nach bhfuil an chuid is m" buach

Please read this BEFOEE you vote. And AFTER you vote, check if my translations are right. Thank me and hoogle translate.
Posted by PeriodicPatriot 3 years ago
PeriodicPatriot
Actually CON, your translations are wrong.

http://translate.google.com...

Thank me later, guys
Posted by DudeStop 3 years ago
DudeStop
Oh I see how it is.

You only needed to tell me why.
Posted by DudeStop 3 years ago
DudeStop
Um... Sure but why?
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by PiercedPanda 3 years ago
PiercedPanda
Zendayalover156HiphopforeverTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con won this debate. He had more convincing arguments, and he explained them in an interesting way. Furthermore, his spelling and grammar was better.
Vote Placed by Swagmasterpoopoo 3 years ago
Swagmasterpoopoo
Zendayalover156HiphopforeverTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's arguments were explained better. Con had better grammar and spelling.
Vote Placed by DudeStop 3 years ago
DudeStop
Zendayalover156HiphopforeverTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: RFD: Because Pro literally asked me to vote for her, I find that poor conduct and unfair to Con. Conduct therefore goes to the Con side of this debate. Con, ironically, had fewer S/G mistakes though she was speaking two different languages. Arguments also go to Con- She was the only one who attacked her opponents case. Pro only said why Disney Channel was good, but did nothing to specify why or how it was better. Arguments to Con. Neither used sources.
Vote Placed by Krazzy_Player 3 years ago
Krazzy_Player
Zendayalover156HiphopforeverTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Personally I used to like "Cartoon Network" more than "Disney Channel" but as Pro here made more convincing arguments she won the arguments. Con could have stated much more points about entertainment programs and other education programs in "Cartoon Network" too and could have stated many other points thus making more convincing arguments.
Vote Placed by Complicated_Mind 3 years ago
Complicated_Mind
Zendayalover156HiphopforeverTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Reasons for voting decision: Very short debate. But since Pro asked I will vote. Conduct is tied. They both were very polite and formal; S&G goes to Con. For Pro I saw a few periods missing (such as in the end) as well as spelling "cartoon" wrong. I believe she made a few more but that's the S&G in a nutshell; Arguments go to Pro. Her argument of life lessons and difficult situations was particularly persuasive. Con merely made the assertion that most children don't want to watch numerous shows on Disney Channel, but backs it up with no proof. The argument made by Con was largely opinionated and was based off of assumption; Neither used sources so that is tied.
Vote Placed by Kc1999 3 years ago
Kc1999
Zendayalover156HiphopforeverTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro had good convincing arguments, and had examples to support it (+2) but no sources. Con wrote Irish and translated it, but her arguments, although strong to a point, were not supported with examples. Both side had grammar errors and no citations, but both sides generally had good conduct.
Vote Placed by kawaii_crazy 3 years ago
kawaii_crazy
Zendayalover156HiphopforeverTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Both sides had spelling/grammar mistakes, did not give sources, and I had very good conduct. Pro's arguments are better because they talk about education and health.