Dissolution of the Federal Reserve
Debate Rounds (4)
Second is first presentation of arguments.
I look forward to debating you.
I accept :), thank you for this debate challenge, and I can't wait to begin :)
Although it may seem strange, the Federal Reserve is not in fact a government owned bank. It is actually a private corporation with private interests. This fact is particularly alarming because the Federal Reserve controls interest rates, and because of this they effectively control the money flow in America. Even more peculiar is the fact that our own government can coin and print its own currency. US congress is given the authority to "coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures". Why are we entrusting our economy to a bunch of unelected private bankers at all?
Amazingly, the greatest period of economic growth in the US occurred when there was no established "Federal Reserve". This was between the civil war and 1913 . Why should we have a corporation running our economy, when there is no inherent value in its application, as supplied by this evidence?
Since the creation of the Federal reserve, there was a drastic increase in inflation. Before the Fed was implemented inflation occurred at a rate of about .5% . After its implementation the percentage of implementation was raised to 3% .
Since the Federal reserve was created the value of the US dollar went down 25% .
This organization was created with the idea in mind that it would reduce or completely rid the US of recessions and depressions. The Fed has completely failed at this directive. 20 years after the Federal reserve was set up the Great Depression occurred . Since then, there have been ten different recessions . This reason alone is justification for the dissolution of the Federal Reserve. If it ultimately fails in its express mandate, then it is clear that we need a new, and better system.
These reasons emperically show that the Federal Reserve should be completely abolished. A better solution would be to simply abolish a central bank. An even better solution would be to implement a system that actually prevents large economic problems, and was not rife with corruption. Either way, the Federal Reserve is clearly not an institution worth maintaining as the central banking system of America.
For these reason I urge a vote in favor of the affirmation.
Terrific arguments :) and thank you for the debate.
My refutals are these...
the value of the US Dollar going down 25%...I beg to differ...the value of the US dollar has gone up in some countries, it is worth more in Dubai than it is here.
The Federal Reserve also insures citizen's money against theft, and it helps when we need to borrow money for hopefully paying off some of our debt.
It also helps keep our good standing as a nation-for instance Fort Knox, the gold there in the federal reserve helps keep some of our moral high.
I rest my case for Round II, good arguments and thank you for the debate :)
The single attack on my case is a denial of the decreased value of the US dollar. My opponent cannot deny that the value of the dollar has declined radically since its creation [1,2], as this evidence empirically proves. I also think that it should be noted that my opponent has not cited any sources for this argument, while I have provided several (the third is in my previous argument).
As to addressing my opponent's provided benefits: My opponent stated that the Fed provides protection against theft. While this is a definite benefit of the Fed, the fact that the Fed has ultimately failed to fulfill its express purpose: prevention of economic recessions or depressions. In fact, these benefits could be provided with our own government, effectively excluding the involvement of a private industry. Because of this, these benefits are negligible, as they support both sides of the debate.
My opponent stated another benefit: that the Federal reserve keeps gold which maintains morale. Ignoring the fact that my opponent again provided no actual evidence, my opponent also completely glossed over the fact that this gold does absolutely nothing. American currency is legal tender, and as such it cannot be redeemed for gold .
I am not arguing that there should never be a central bank. The main objective of my argument is to prove that the Federal reserve should be dissolved. I prove this because of the fact that the Federal reserve has ultimately failed at exactly what it was designed to do: protect the US from economic recessions and depressions. If a person has a tool that no longer functions, then he discards it and replaces it with a better one, or he goes without it. I am promoting the fact that our own government has the authority to do all of the things that the Fed does, without the private intervention. In fact, if the government took on this responsibility than that very system would be easier to repair because it would lie within the government's jurisdiction, and as such the US would inevitably determine a method to preventing the economic recessions (or at least have a better alternative).
As I have proved that the Federal reserve should be abolished through my superior examples and evidence, and I have effectively negated the entirety of my opponent's case I urge votes in favor of the Pro.
I thank you for the debate my friend, and I think you have won me over :). Concession grants you this one, and I think you have changed my views :)
Kylar forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||6||0|
Reasons for voting decision: Con ff a round, conceded, and had no sources.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.