Do video games cause bad behavior in children?
Debate Rounds (2)
I don't think that's a defenseable position. Myself being only recently out of childhood, and both an avid gamer throughout as well as having a history of mild childhood violence (playground stuff, not burning kittens), I can attest to the introduction of videogames having no bearing on my violence (in fact, only arguably decreasing it, keeping me inside, and focused on something I could achieve, rather than confusing, frustrating social world!). I would hit and bite my sister before they came along, and as we grew, and videogames came along and grew in violence, incidents of violent behaviour decreased. I have no difficulty separating the morality and consequences of violence against pixels and data, and the same against humans and other beings. They can hardly even be considered the same thing.
I would even argue that the stress relief of the representation of violence, the act of having a safe space in which to play out violent imagery, ideas, and behaviours without hurting anyone, is healthy for highly stressed children as we have today. Especially boys, who are increasingly unsupported, and even discriminated against by systemic values favouring behaviors and sensibilities statistically measureable as more likely exhibiting my females, boys who are as well as the overwhelming majority of gamers, would benefit from spaces where their behaviour is not shamed or suppressed, and benefit from exploring this on their own terms, and the objective/reward and compete/fail/win processes which teach a healthy coping with the ups and downs of life.
Here's some "con" research:
"It's more complicated than games = more violence" (http://www.theguardian.com...)
"Don't blame the tool, it's how we use it" (http://www.forbes.com...)
"Violence in games doesn't cause violence. But claims that 'the violence in games causes violence' cause violence" (http://www.theguardian.com...)
MariahKelly123 forfeited this round.
I'm the king of the rumba beat.
When I play the maracas I go
Chick chicky boom chick
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Josh_b 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||3|
Reasons for voting decision: pro had a good opening, i just wish more evidence would have been provided. No conduct points due to random, unrelated poem in the last round.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.