Do wars help secure the average person, mind and body both?
Debate Rounds (4)
< New land to own
< Merely conquering
< Wanted resources found in the territory they want
< To get rid of a certain race, religion, or belief
< To save their country from any threats they fear
< They hate the opponent
So, yes, there are more reasons, reasonable or not, for which a country or government would actually want to start a war. But how does this effect the colonists? How about even the people inside the army. Almost always, a person will be involved in a war because
a) They are forced in a war
b) They want to serve their country willingly
c) They feel the war needs a new perspective
We can assume that they are usually picked in the category b), because many people believe their country is theirs, it belongs to them. What makes a country? A good government? Much money? Good land? A smart army? Yes, yes, yes, and yes . . . but that is what makes a country into a good country. What makes the country itself? The people in it. A country is defended by the people who own it, the country in itself. Why would they take part in something they don't think is worth it? No one uses their life on something they think will fail. Everyone, and I mean everyone, needs to feel a safe environment. Would you, or anyone you know, fight to keep a torture device running if you knew that tomorrow it would torture you? Is there any chance of you risking your life, so that your jail cell guard would keep his eyes on you? a person needs to not only feel, but know that the country they are serving and protecting will fight to give them the best they could get. Do wars create that sense of strength and protection? I know one thing wars do. wars give your country extra money. Extra money for the country means more war supplies. with more war supplies, the colonists feel safer, they can now know that their country is better than the opponent. what happens then? They work harder to keep this thing going! What better determination than to know you will live longer, because your country is trying? So here is the question that sets the debate off . . .
"Do wars help secure our average person?"
The public are pawns of this manipulation and it depends on the country of origin to decipher how bad the manipulation is. Most wars are unjust but some are necessary to prevent larger escalations. Humans are war like creatures so to some degree it does secure the body and mind theory you propose as it appeals to the raw human psychology within us. The reality of war changes that way of thinking for the survivors of war and the ones who don't survive are statistics and irrelevant. The war machine keeps turning but the wheel of these turns is geared by fear, power hunger, and control. These are not true methods to achieve spiritual solidity of the body and mind. This will need to be evolved out of our system otherwise our destruction is imminent.
Countries are how people identify themselves and become prideful. This pride is usually based on comparing themselves to other countries. The ones with less have a higher rate of warlike behaviour. The removal of countries will be one of the best achievements humans can make as we will become more global in our thinking rather than nationalistic. Nationalistic thinking drives warlike behaviour. Once we identify ourselves as earthlings then we can solve many of the global crises. In the current format we exploit the weak nations and try to profit from there pain. This warlike behaviour is causing rebellion and terrorism as the weak are rising against this feeling of exploitation. Globalism by the removal of nation states would create more cohesiveness. This cohesiveness will lead to a true strengthening of the body, mind and spirit. War is the illusion that one is administered by the powerful. This power is an illusion in itself as it will lead to everyone's destruction. Global cooperation, kindness and unity will achieve a healthy body, spirit, and mind for all. Peace.
When you fight a war you creat a symbol, a monument. China has the "Great Wall of China", America has the "Statue of Liberty", Russia has a few, including the "Cathedral of St. Sophia", and the "Kremlin". All of those serve different purposes as far as what they represent. They represent honor, independence, strength and power, and more. But there is something they all do for their country. They all stand as a representation. Now that they have something to prove, something that other nations either:
B) want to destroy
The enemies now have a reason to fight for their destruction. Now they mean something. Now people notice their country. "Feared yet wanted by all". That's what every country wants, isn't it? For people to realize there is a reason to notice them.
With a monument we now own the land, we aren't just on it. Is fighting not terrible enough that is deserves punishment? Do we reward those who decide to waste lives, throw away money, and risk everything just to destroy someone else? Yes we do. But why do we pretend it is a good thing? It' she cause we want it for ourselves also, and to get it, we have to give it to others. So fighting can be good in some ways, but bad in many other ways.
I am trying to get a perspective of both sides as you can see, but I assure you I am against random war.
Every time you try to think of how a general's mind works (for those who do it) you can't imagine being so blind. Who would do that just to break down the Great Wall of China? Not me . . . But wait yes you would. Who can resist finishing off their opponent once they have them in their grasp. Why let the tiger go when you have a rope around his jaw? Anyone who feels confident to have war will go after it. So why start war at all?
You said that pride usually comes from countries comparing themselves to other countries. Why compare? That nation has a wall and you have a statue . . . Great! Now forget about destroying their wall just so you will stand out from the others. What if you do stand out from the other nations on earth? Then you are in the spotlight and what do you do then? You can't turn back now, everyone is against you. Standing out isn't always the best thing. If you are hungry for death, war, and rage between to nations, who says your enemies won't be either? Like you said, HGFLYER, it is like the wheels of gears. When you start turning, you keep going fast and faster. When you get too tired to keep up with the wheel, everyone else is still turning it, so you just get dragged along. It' say bumpy ride, too. Why go through all the trouble, if it is not what you want to commit to the whole time. What if it is what you are ready to keep at for the rest of your life. Hitler seems to be a very widely-used example, but I will use him again. When he decided to kill a whole race, he obviously knew it would take more than his lifetime, so he made it count. My did he make it count, indeed. We still know him right? Everyone who is past 4th grade knows who Hitler was. Why do we know who he was? Because he made a gigantic mark, and stuck with it until his death! That is why countries fight for their cause! They see something valuable, like the Kremlin statue, and use it as their basis.
"Oh, Russia? That's where the famous statues used to be. They sure did pursue in the ___ war. Now look at them, most famous country and government on earth."
That is what everyone who governs a nation wants. To be recognized. Does war really create that? Is it exactly what you need to make yourself known, by slaughtering millions? Hitler did it, but is Germany still the dreaded nation it was 3 years after he died?
Back to the concept of Control which drives warlike behaviour....To maintain control one needs to make constant decisions that allow for domination. It is not possible to calculate all the variables, especially during war and thus control becomes impossible. Striving for less control actually brings more peace and power to ones life. The reason is the closest representation of control comes at the individualistic level. I can control how I feel, think, act etc but it is very challenging to control others. Think of this in terms of countries vying for control. How can a country attempt to control another when there are so many different variables and options that remove the control. Look at Iraq as an example. America left Iraq in what they thought was a controlled situation that would lead to a shining democracy. It even looked like that was the case upon there departure a few years ago but today's reality is much different. The control we thought we created was never really in place and was a total illusion. The many variables within Iraq both religious, historical, cultural, regional, and more created a situation where control was never possible for the long term. I'm not suggesting isolationism as the answer but I am suggesting less attempts to try to control as it is not possible. Smart, selective decisions are more powerful than large, sweeping, illusionary attempts to establish control. A smarter approach is selective assassination of evil, grassroots programs promoting freedom and democracy, and selective missions of special forces teams. At the end of the day even those decisions are attempts at control and usually do not solve the core problems.
My friend - follow the guideline of KISS - Keep It Simple Stupid.....This approach is needed globally but unfortunately we are not there yet and won't be in our lives. You can harness your individualism by understanding that a simple life is your greatest method of control. It will allow you to have ownership of your feelings, not let others influence how you feel and to establish boundaries. You can pursue your dreams, help others and influence the world but if you start reaching for power, money, decadence you are no longer living the simple life you are trying to control life. This control is in a vein attempt to have more....You will have the most if you strive for simple ideals that are Godly. Love - real connection - charity and respect are simple concepts that will fill you with more than any riches can. Understanding that power and control are games of opposites is a challenging concept but read up on it and you will see that control is the greatest illusion and one that history has tried to teach us over and over again. Human nature pushes people for control and human nature pushes us to our imminent destruction. Peace my friend!
witheringtrees forfeited this round.
witheringtrees forfeited this round.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.