The Instigator
Pro (for)
The Contender
Con (against)

Do you need to be afraid to be brave?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
benjen_stark has forfeited round #3.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/21/2017 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 543 times Debate No: 100118
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (4)
Votes (0)




A buddy of mine tried to tell me that it is possible to be brave without being afraid of something. I think this is wrong, and goes against the very definition of bravery.


Definition of 'bravery':
The "readiness" to face trouble, pain, danger, etc. with courage and without fear. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]

Being since the overwhelming majority of English dictionaries seem to give this definition of 'bravery' in some way or another, we can easily assume that this definition is correct, and since this definition desribes a state "without fear", we can further conclude that you do not require fear to be brave and even that, as you said, being fearful is the exact opposite of being brave.

Your friend was indeed mistaken.

Possible debate issues:
If you were going to argue the position I have taken, then I apologize. The way the debate was set up seemed to me like you were going to argue for the debate topic (i.e. you do need to be fearful to be brave) because you are, in fact, 'pro'.

Debate Round No. 1


I am sorry if the way I set up this argument is confusing. This is my first experience on and I am still figuring it out.

I am arguing that to be brave, you do, in fact, need to have fear of something.
To quote Eddard Stark from A Game of Thrones:

"Bran thought about it. 'Can a man still be brave if he's afraid?'
'That is the only time a man can be brave,' his father told him."
- George R.R. Martin, A Game of Thrones

In response to the definition argument: the Merriam Webster dictionary defines bravery as "the quality or state of having or showing mental or moral strength to face danger, fear, or difficulty".
So according to this widely accepted definition, bravery is displayed in response to a fear.



This really is just up to interpretation.

Even though I have provided more sources that support my position, I will concede the argument due to the lack of "correctness" either of us could have.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
4 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Posted by Perussi 9 months ago
DrCereal, you are a math guy? How can i calculate if a line passes through the area of a circle? (or is on the border at any point of it's path)
Posted by DrCereal 1 year ago
That and there's very little I could actually add at this point.
Posted by Aspirant 1 year ago
Instigator claims to reject it, but isn't the debate setup so he's for it?
If he took the con side I'd consider jumping on this, for bravery is the mental strength to face fear. Without fear there is nothing to be brave against.
Posted by d-baiter 1 year ago
It just an argument on linguistics. Each side will give different meaning to the word.
This debate has 0 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.