The Instigator
Andreas3
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
fire_wings
Pro (for)
Winning
8 Points

Do you support animal cruelty?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
fire_wings
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/31/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 428 times Debate No: 81843
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (3)
Votes (2)

 

Andreas3

Con

I would like to know you opinion about animal cruelty?
fire_wings

Pro

I accept this debate. Arguments will go in the next round.

Note: This debate is a concession from Pro.
Debate Round No. 1
Andreas3

Con

First of all,thank you for the honor.What is your opinion regarding the slaughter of all kind of animals for fur/leather :calf , crocodile , elephant etc? Do your support it? And if so ,why?
fire_wings

Pro

I support animal cruelty. The BOP is on both of us. First of all I will say that Con is making a concession by saying our opinion.

I support animal cruelty because of one reasons. I will give more reasons after.

1. Cruelty supports us

Okay, my first argument is that cruelty of these animals support us animals.

Okay, first of all I will list some animals we kill. Farm animals and animals for fur.

First of all, we do not need to much farm animals. They just take up a lot of space. I think we should reduce some farm animals. There are too many farm animals which is a waste of space. We can do this by eating them. Cruelty supports us by food.

Let's give you a second animal. An lamb. This is a farm animal also. However there are two reasons for this animal for us. First of all, it gives us food which is a very important source for us. Second of all it gives us clothes by all the lamb fur. Even though these animals die and animal cruelty, it help us with food and fur, lots of other reasons.


Okay, this was my argument. Next round will have one more argument. Because Con is saying my opinion, because I am saying my opinion, I win this debate.
Debate Round No. 2
Andreas3

Con

Andreas3 forfeited this round.
fire_wings

Pro

Because Con forfeited this round, there is nothing to rebut. Vote for Pro.
Debate Round No. 3
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by fire_wings 1 year ago
fire_wings
Thanks for your vote.
Posted by GoOrDin 1 year ago
GoOrDin
define animal cruelty.

throwing kittens and baby birds? BAD
kicking cats and dogs? BAD
yelling at dog and being inconsiderate of their perspectives, and personalities? BAD
testing rats? dependant on methods.
caging animals? dependant on personable interactions.

allowing undomesticated predators to eat prey? BAD
allowing the world to be void of fruit because we suggest carnivore lifestyles are permissible? BAD

treating animals as though they do not suffer emotional and physical pain? BAD

eating animals? with dietary and eco-zone compaticity.
killing animals for safety? Acceptable.

Animal testing? acceptable.

inconsideracy is always bad.
Posted by arianatopmusic 1 year ago
arianatopmusic
Animal cruelty mustn't be supported in anyway. Just because animals can't really oppose human beings, who perceive themselves as superior in this world, doesn't mean that they should be taken advantage of - for animal testing and everything else. We all live on the same planet, we all have access to similar natural resourses, we all walk on the same ground - all living creatures have rights. Just imagine what would have been if we,humans, lived in the kingdom of animals and this time cruelty was applied targeted on us.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by famousdebater 1 year ago
famousdebater
Andreas3fire_wingsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff left pros arguments unrefuted. The ff also costed con the conduct point.
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
Andreas3fire_wingsTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to Pro due to Con's forfeiture. Arguments to Pro since he's the only one who actually made an argument while Con asked a few questions and that was it. With that I have no choice, but to give this debate to Pro.