The Instigator
kendranoel
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
tajshar2k
Pro (for)
Winning
15 Points

Do you think one direction should give up on their musical carrers?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
tajshar2k
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/15/2015 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 703 times Debate No: 73501
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (5)
Votes (3)

 

kendranoel

Con

one direction help girls who feel unloved and like no one cares about them feel a need to life if we give up on them then alot of people might go back to cutting or try and committ suicide.
tajshar2k

Pro

I accept.
Debate Round No. 1
kendranoel

Con

One direction. Is a great band and makes girls everywhere so happy and if they gave up their careers then a lot of people would rage. Directioners are the biggest fandom right now they would do anything to get them back if they quit
tajshar2k

Pro

THE BOP is on Con


One Direction is a great band, and makes girls everywhere so happy

Con must prove that all girls are happy with one direction with statistics.


if they gave up their careers then a lot of people would rage.

Con must define "a lot" From where I come from, people would be celebrating with joy in their tiny little hearts.


Directioners are the biggest fandom right now they would do anything to get them back if they quit

Con must tell me what they will do, and provide sources.



Have a nice day :P







Debate Round No. 2
kendranoel

Con

Look on google statistics show that all of their fans would go back to feeling ugly and useless like a waste of space. They would go back to cutting. Girls would take their lives for these boys. Now I agree with u that all of this seems silly and dumb but these girls would go to extraordinary lengths for them. As for me I just think there amazing
tajshar2k

Pro

Con, you haven't given sources, you can't ask the challenger to look it up for himself.


Call me cruel, but personally, I wouldn't care if they cut themselves. Not only are those girls setting a bad example for others, but they give a false impression that our society is completely insane. Giving them what they want isn't going to fix anything. Would you give a Crack addict more crack so he wouldn't be angry?
Debate Round No. 3
kendranoel

Con

Now I agree with u there I wouldn't give a crack addict more crack if he was angry.
But one direction is an awesome band
Www.onedirection.com
tajshar2k

Pro

I guess my opponent forfeited.
Debate Round No. 4
kendranoel

Con

No I don't forfeit and here is my final argument.

They are not unpopular like these other gay bands. People love and support one direction. We love them for their unique styles and music. They make amazing music that touches people's hearts and for those who think differently they can go off themselves. And since they make such great music they get money from it. People from where u live might have Been dropped on their head when they were babies but no matter who tries to get in there way us directioners will destroy the haters. So after ur done being a total tard. U can go back to ur swanky hore house and listen to Justin beiber I guessing with ur lack of intelligences that u would listen to him.
tajshar2k

Pro

LOL vote Pro. Con never rufuted any of arguments, and called other bands gay.
Debate Round No. 5
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by SocialPsyche 2 years ago
SocialPsyche
That girl's conduct in the last argument...
Posted by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
It's mostly something to be very careful of in future. She did all but concede the debate there.

Honestly, I think this debate was an attempt at social media advertising for the band.
Posted by tajshar2k 2 years ago
tajshar2k
I actually thought she forfeited, because she said I agree with you, then a link.
Posted by Lee001 2 years ago
Lee001
Hell yes they should.
Posted by birdlandmemories 2 years ago
birdlandmemories
All I can say is wow...
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by SocialPsyche 2 years ago
SocialPsyche
kendranoeltajshar2kTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was just...I don't think she gets how to debate at all...
Vote Placed by Ragnar 2 years ago
Ragnar
kendranoeltajshar2kTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:14 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: Call it pity if you like, but the claimed forfeit never happened (yes pro you are going to win, this is advice to help you keep winning in future). Con effectively tying her own feet together before a race, doesn't mean she didn't show up (as much as such would have been preferable). S&G: Con clearly surrendered this, in fact I think con was attempting to surrender conduct as well, but her words were too unintelligible for me to make out what was likely intended as insults; which really just ended up insulting herself. Arguments: I will give con credit here, the pathos appeal of suicide threats probably take her far in life; pro lacked pathos appeals, however the sheer domination in cross examination easily overcomes this. Plus con could not even find anything on google, asking pro to find something for her, really isn't how debate works. Sources: Yes con had them, having sources doesn't say anything about them contributing to the argument.
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 2 years ago
Midnight1131
kendranoeltajshar2kTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct to pro, because con crossed a few lines when she called other bands "gay," and said this... " U can go back to ur swanky hore house and listen to Justin beiber I guessing with ur lack of intelligences that u would listen to him." Arguments goes to Pro, because they made good arguments, such as how one direction fans cutting themselves sets a bad example to others, and we can't just cater to their every whim. He made an example of crack addicts, and said we wouldn't keep giving them more drugs just to keep them happy. Con never refuted any of cons arguments, and instead chose to insult people who didn't like One Direction. Con even agreed with what Pro said about the crack addicts. Sources is tied, because con's only source was just a link to onedirection.com, and it held no importance in the debate, or the arguments they were making.