The Instigator
CodyNiskanen
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Debaters9
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points

Does God support gay marriage?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/9/2015 Category: Religion
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 501 times Debate No: 79567
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (5)
Votes (0)

 

CodyNiskanen

Con

Hello, in this debate we are going to take a look at whether or not God supports gay marriage. I believe that God does not and that gay marriage is an abomination and should not be allowed. Also, I believe that the Supreme Court does not have the power to make a law allowing gay marriage.
Debaters9

Pro

Yes he does because he's God.
Debate Round No. 1
CodyNiskanen

Con

Thank you for accepting my debate. In your opening statement, you said that God accepts Gay marriage. If you were to read the 3rd chapter of Genesis, you would see that God created man and woman to be together "But for Adam[f] no suitable helper was found. 21 So the Lord God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man"s ribs and then closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the Lord God made a woman from the rib he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man." Now you say that God accepts Gay marriage when he created man and woman not mam and man or woman and woman. If the Lord had intended for us to marry the same sex, then he would have created us with the same sex. In Romans, Paul warns of such things this reason. God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; 27 and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their error.
Debaters9

Pro

Debaters9 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
CodyNiskanen

Con

CodyNiskanen forfeited this round.
Debaters9

Pro

Debaters9 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
CodyNiskanen

Con

CodyNiskanen forfeited this round.
Debaters9

Pro

Debaters9 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
CodyNiskanen

Con

CodyNiskanen forfeited this round.
Debaters9

Pro

Debaters9 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
But MagicAintReal is right, you have to define all of the important terms in the debate, especially to which god you're referring.
Posted by Jonbonbon 1 year ago
Jonbonbon
V5RED: You can argue agreeing on certain assumptions in order to make the debate easier. The understood assumption in this debate is that God exists, and it doesn't necessarily have to be true for it to be the agreed assumption.
Posted by V5RED 1 year ago
V5RED
Given that God is not established as existing yet, you should probably be arguing as to whether he supports it if he exists, not whether he supports it.
Posted by CodyNiskanen 1 year ago
CodyNiskanen
God in this debate is the God of the christians.
Posted by MagicAintReal 1 year ago
MagicAintReal
You have to define god in this debate. If not, then someone's god could be homosexuality itself...just saying, you should add definitions.
No votes have been placed for this debate.