The Instigator
ChokingChlorine
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Con (against)
Winning
7 Points

Does Mr. Repzion somewhat talk like a male form of Kate from Drew Carey show

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
ResponsiblyIrresponsible
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/24/2015 Category: Funny
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 504 times Debate No: 76919
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (4)

 

ChokingChlorine

Pro

When I hear the voice of Repzion on Youtube, he sounds somewhat like a male version of Kate from the Drew Carey show. I'm sorry about your speech impediment, Rep.
ResponsiblyIrresponsible

Con

I accept. PRO has the sole burden of proof in this debate to prove that "Mr. Repzion somewhat talks like a male form of Kate from Drew Carey Show." Note that his burden is to prove this *objectively* such that it applies universally; it cannot simply be his subjective opinion. If he fails to prove that, you default to CON.
Debate Round No. 1
ChokingChlorine

Pro

ChokingChlorine forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
ChokingChlorine

Pro

ChokingChlorine forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
ChokingChlorine

Pro

ChokingChlorine forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
ChokingChlorine

Pro

ChokingChlorine forfeited this round.
ResponsiblyIrresponsible

Con

PRO has done nothing to advance his BOP.

Therefore, vote CON.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Dookieman 1 year ago
Dookieman
Mr. Repzion's voice is so annoying. He sounds like a stupid little kid, haha.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
ChokingChlorineResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 1 year ago
Midnight1131
ChokingChlorineResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by tejretics 1 year ago
tejretics
ChokingChlorineResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit.
Vote Placed by Ragnar 1 year ago
Ragnar
ChokingChlorineResponsiblyIrresponsibleTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF. A subjective example or two would have done it, but as con pointed out "PRO has done nothing" an argument continued from R1, and the only one presented in the debate.