The Instigator
SUPMON
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Mharman
Con (against)
Winning
16 Points

Does Trump look like a blobfish?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+2
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Mharman
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 4/21/2017 Category: Funny
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,007 times Debate No: 102119
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (4)

 

SUPMON

Pro

Look at a picture of Trump. Now a blobfish. Do you see ANY differences? Even their PERSONALITY is the same!
Mharman

Con

Here's a side by side comparison. http://www.debate.org...

Donald Trump doe NOT look alike a blobfish.

Trump has...
- Orange skin
- Human nose (long triangle, visible nostrils)
- Golden Hair
- Golden Eyebrows
- No drool

A blobfish has...
- Pink skin
- Huge, oval-shaped nose
- No hair
- No eyebrows
- Mucus-like drool

As you can see, there are plenty of differences. I rest my case. Please vote con.
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by JimShady 1 year ago
JimShady
Mharman rackin' up Elo points by the dozen
Posted by Mharman 1 year ago
Mharman
Emilrose vote in a nutshell: Mharman used Argument! It's super effective! The opponent's SUPMON fainted!
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by TheDragon5 1 year ago
TheDragon5
SUPMONMharmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro's only argument was just asserting that President Trump looks like a blobfish without providing any evidence or sources. Con used the best possible source, a side-by-side comparison. As if this wasn't enough to destroy Pro's argument, Con even listed the blobfish's physical characteristics along with the President's. Con wins.
Vote Placed by QueenDaisy 1 year ago
QueenDaisy
SUPMONMharmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro asserted that there were no differences between Donald Trump and a blobfish. Con provided pictures of both and pointed out the differences between the two- hence, Con's case is more convincing. Con provided an external source while Pro did not- hence, source points to Con. Neither seemed to have particularly poor conduct, and I didn't spot any spelling or grammar errors.
Vote Placed by Emilrose 1 year ago
Emilrose
SUPMONMharmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was the only one to use an argument.
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
SUPMONMharmanTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was the only one who made an argument, so arguments to Con by default.