The Instigator
annie04
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
scorepit
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Does VR needs restriction?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/11/2018 Category: Science
Updated: 6 months ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 174 times Debate No: 106590
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (0)

 

annie04

Pro

I think VR technology need a restriction.
VR is a shorter word of 'virtual reality'. It means a technique that allows the user to experience the spatial and temporal experience in close proximity to the real world. Virtual Reality is now available in games movies and many other fields. This technology makes user fool. users believe VR and move based on it. This can be dangerous. What if users had to get out of the fire while they were accessing the virtual reality? In this kind of situation, VR downgrades people quick reactions. After all, VR shows us a different view of reality so users could bump into real stuff. In fact, a man died while playing a VR in Rusia.
SF fiction depicts situations in which people are spewing out the virtues, lust, and violence that are not satisfied in reality through virtual reality. And VR distinguishes between reality and virtual. If VR made up of sexual and violent content, people who used VR could influence. For example, in Tokyo game show The sensor was installed intensively on the chest area of the mannequin to realize the feeling of touching the chest in 2D space. Male spectators who touched the chest of this high school girl character and played a game close to obscene acts.
So I think VR need restriction. VR must use safely.
scorepit

Con

Look, in vr you know it's not real. Also most people are careful not to bump into stuff, so deaths and injuries are rare. Also what you just said could be applied to the internet and videogames. People could spew out their problems their too. It's no different then in vr. People should just be allowed to do whatever the hell they want in vr just like how they can do whatever the hell they want in videogames because they're the same except one responds to real life movement. Finally how does it make people get slower reaction times in real life? I don't understand what you're point even was, vr doesn't mess with peoples minds or anything if that's what your saying. Also the title is incorrect grammar, you shoulda titled it "does vr need restriction" not "does vr needs restriction?" that doesn't make grammatical sense. VR doesn't have many consequences unless you're an idiot or something and think you need to walk around in real life. Or if you're such an idiot that you think it's real, i mean the only restriction i could think of that's reasonable is where retarded people can't use vr so they don't get confused and think it's real life.
Debate Round No. 1
annie04

Pro

Sorry about grammar;;
Also sorry about my phrase. When you using VR your brain accepting VR wallpaper and something happens, in reality, you must be confused and flustration for a moment.
VR technology is so much good now. User knew VR is not real. But VR immersion user and this kind of thing happen.
http://m.bboom.naver.com...=
Because this reacts, a user could hurt and even die. Here is an example.https://www.techworm.net...
People can't control them selfs when they are using VR. To prevent the accident, I think VR needs restriction.
Also, the immersive virtual reality is subject to such ethical controversy. For example, in the Tokyo game show, this phenomenon has occurred due to the reality of virtual reality. http://news.chosun.com...
Especially for children, violence VR contents make children bluntly to violence.
scorepit

Con

You say vr has some inapropiate stuff for kids but so do videogames. But there are different types of videogames just like how there are different types of VR games. Some are apropiate for kids some arn't. Virtual Reality games can't trick you into thinking it's real life any more then videogames can.
Debate Round No. 2
annie04

Pro

people play a video game on there sit. And just as parents are limiting violent video games, you should also limit the VR that are more vivid than video games. I think Vr need restriction because Virtual Reality games maybe can't trick the user into thinking it's real life anymore then video games can, but it's more stimulating because it can be vivid and immersive. More stimulating means it gives more effects. If you knew VR isn't real when it use, but it can make you bluntly from bad contents.
scorepit

Con

Are you saying restriction for kids? Because in that sense i agree with you. But if you mean restriction on games for everyone then no.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
No votes have been placed for this debate.