The Instigator
jethro_purazo
Con (against)
Winning
6 Points
The Contender
AirAcolyte
Pro (for)
Losing
3 Points

Does ancient gods really existed?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
jethro_purazo
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/12/2015 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 418 times Debate No: 68186
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (1)
Votes (3)

 

jethro_purazo

Con

For me, there is only one God. It depends on you if you believe the ancient gods.
AirAcolyte

Pro

The people of the ancient world would not write and paint such things about the Ancient Gods if they weren't true or seen by the Ancient People, so I believe that they have existed and watching us through the skies.
Debate Round No. 1
jethro_purazo

Con

So your are saying that these so called ancient gods have powers? That they can watch us in the skies? And in your past argument, you called them "God" instead of "god". It means, God the Father has an equal god? And If they are a god. They should not die.

PS: Not comparing God the Father because He is most powerful.
AirAcolyte

Pro

AirAcolyte forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
vi_spex
unicorn is almost an ancient god
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by 1Credo 2 years ago
1Credo
jethro_purazoAirAcolyteTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture- points to Con.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 2 years ago
Zarroette
jethro_purazoAirAcolyteTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Considering that Con instigated, I'll assume that the BoP is shared. I found neither side of the arguments compelling, largely because they were way too short. Perhaps mere elaboration would have been enough to win arguments. Con wins conduct for Pro's round forfeit.
Vote Placed by rikomalpense 2 years ago
rikomalpense
jethro_purazoAirAcolyteTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct: Pro forfeited, point to Con. S/G, Sources: No sources on both sides and equal S/G. Tied. Arguments: Con failed to prove why the Judeo-Christian God would exist while pagan gods would not. Pro fulfilled their BOP better. Point to Pro.