The Instigator
Billybobkat
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
alex0828
Pro (for)
Winning
6 Points

Does anyone think Kenneth J Babcock is funny?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/12/2011 Category: Health
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 936 times Debate No: 17890
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (2)

 

Billybobkat

Con

I don't think so
alex0828

Pro

Kenneth J Babcock is hilarious. Just look at his name.

Now, who is this person btw?
Debate Round No. 1
Billybobkat

Con

while your point is valid, Kenneth "bad-cock" Babcock is a man who, as a joke on facebook, recommended I join this site as a way of insinuating that I enjoy arguing about things. I don't think that's particularly funny, so I decided to start a debate about whether people think he is funny, which I think in itself is much funnier. What do you think?
alex0828

Pro

funny- Causing laughter or amusement; humorous.

I am assuming your side of the argument is that you are funny and he is not. My side is that he is and you are not. It was not humorous or amusing that you made an account on debate.org, but I do find it humorous that he suggested you joined this fantastic website
Debate Round No. 2
Billybobkat

Con

well then, according the definition of "funny" which you provided, we must conclude that both of us are funny, since both actions produced laugher, albeit in different people. I am glad we could have this discussion
alex0828

Pro

I am glad also, but unfortunately this debate is pretty much a spam debate. The title doesn't even agree with the resolution. Vote Pro since con just made an account for this debate.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by 000ike 6 years ago
000ike
Billybobkatalex0828Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Billybobkat, maybe you should change your avatar, it makes you look like izbo.
Vote Placed by larztheloser 6 years ago
larztheloser
Billybobkatalex0828Tied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:13 
Reasons for voting decision: conduct to con, pro should watch personal insults. Arguments to pro, because his burden of proof was to show somebody thinks a given thing is funny. No counter-analysis was given by the con. Just because con doesn't think something is humorous doesn't mean that's true for everyone.