The Instigator
The-Holy-Macrel
Pro (for)
Winning
8 Points
The Contender
Sathvik
Con (against)
Losing
1 Points

Does god exist?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
The-Holy-Macrel
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/22/2014 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 514 times Debate No: 62093
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (9)
Votes (3)

 

The-Holy-Macrel

Pro

First round we take a bow preparing for battle
Second to Fourth round full on war -no preemptive rebuttles on second round NOTHING PERSONAL!!!!!!!! No putting the other person down. Keep it clean-
Finally the last round is confessions/hi's and Bye's
The best of luck to you.
Debate Round No. 1
The-Holy-Macrel

Pro

Ok lets get started.
For an arguement you need something certain so lets look at the work of plato. (you can look this up)
He set fourth that the only thing that is certainis that we exist. Since we exist we can build from that.
I build first that since we exist that we first must be made. But what from? I awnser this with for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. For an improfection there first must be a profection. Since the big bang has none it is out so therefore there is some kind of profection.
A god is a supreme being. But the greeks created thier gods in the image of themselves which means another improfection.
That eliminates polytheism. So we are left with monotheism. In cristianity it is impossible for a person to earn salvation, the only way that a person can get to heaven is through Jesus Christ. When jesus dies on the cross he eliminated sin from the equasion and therefore making us pure. The jewish faith doesn't have that so therefore the equasion is incomplete eliminating it. Since islam has an incomplete equasion as well it is eliminated. So we are left with christianity being the last variable but now that i exist i must prove that he exists. But with this i have established that christianity is the only possible faith/religion
The equasion looks like this:
God+creation=sin+purity
God and purity are positive while creation and sin are negative. God washed away our sin so they cancel each other out. Creation and purity cancel each other out and so we have a valid equasion without extra variables. There is no other way for a proper equasion to be unless nothing = nothing which leaves out the variable that we exist and so finally we can reach a logical conclusion that god does indeed exist.
BTW: the big bang could still have been created by god.

Conclusion: God is a proper variable therefore he exists.
Sathvik

Con

Sathvik forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
The-Holy-Macrel

Pro

Why did you forfit that round?
Sathvik

Con

Sathvik forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
The-Holy-Macrel

Pro

The-Holy-Macrel forfeited this round.
Sathvik

Con

Sathvik forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
The-Holy-Macrel

Pro

Since con has not posted anything i get an automatic win.
Sathvik

Con

Sathvik forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 5
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by The-Holy-Macrel 2 years ago
The-Holy-Macrel
I actually meant christianity but forgot to specify it.
Posted by republicofdhar 2 years ago
republicofdhar
The argument is very strange... Judaism and Islam are not valid religions because they do not offer a path to salvation the way Christianity does?
Posted by The-Holy-Macrel 2 years ago
The-Holy-Macrel
(still funny though, nice one.)
Posted by The-Holy-Macrel 2 years ago
The-Holy-Macrel
Did you even read my arguement?
Posted by Darkdrow 2 years ago
Darkdrow
Of course he does. He hangs out in a bar downtown with his friends superman, the tooth fairy, Santa Claus and that leprechaun that makes the cereal. Hell the bar it's self is ran by the Keebler elves. They outgrew their tree.
Posted by The-Holy-Macrel 2 years ago
The-Holy-Macrel
For a fact you need something certain. That is what i based this off of physics and mathematics two studies that rely on logic.
Posted by Natsu_Dragneel 2 years ago
Natsu_Dragneel
LOL Well played sir.
Posted by Jonbonbon 2 years ago
Jonbonbon
Lol, I'm liking Sathvik.

Please, continue.
Posted by Jonbonbon 2 years ago
Jonbonbon
Needs more invisibledeity.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
The-Holy-MacrelSathvikTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by republicofdhar 2 years ago
republicofdhar
The-Holy-MacrelSathvikTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: My vote will probably surprise, but here's my reasoning. Pro's arguments were just babble. A hotchpotch of flawed logic, mistaken use of Newton's laws, and some other meaningless points. It appears as though he was trying to display a scientific reasoning for existence of the supernatural, but I must say he failed spectacularly. I cannot give him points for arguments, because he convinced me just about as much as Con did. (not at all) Pro's spelling and grammar was atrocious to the point of incoherence, but Con's one word had no spelling or grammatical flaw. Pro doesn't get conduct because he forfeited one round as well.
Vote Placed by mishapqueen 2 years ago
mishapqueen
The-Holy-MacrelSathvikTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:40 
Reasons for voting decision: Con failed to provide any argumentation. Pro supported his arguments with logic and reasoning.