The Instigator
Sitar
Pro (for)
The Contender
Amedexyius
Con (against)

Does it make more sense for life to begin at implantation than fertilization?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Debate Round Forfeited
Sitar has forfeited round #2.
Our system has not yet updated this debate. Please check back in a few minutes for more options.
Time Remaining
00days00hours00minutes00seconds
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 7/11/2016 Category: Philosophy
Updated: 10 months ago Status: Debating Period
Viewed: 244 times Debate No: 93581
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)

 

Sitar

Pro

Pro means yes, and Con means no. What my question means is is if implantation and fertilization were the only options, which one would make more sense for life to begin?
Amedexyius

Con

I accept this debate. I'll use this round as acceptance as I believe my opponent still needs to completely illustrate their points.
Debate Round No. 1
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 2
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 3
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 4
This round has not been posted yet.
This round has not been posted yet.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Murdoc 10 months ago
Murdoc
'Life begins' is fairly vague. This seems like an argument between two members opposed to abortion, you being slightly more progressive. I'm curious when general human rights should first be granted. I would argue much later than implantation.
This debate has 6 more rounds before the voting begins. If you want to receive email updates for this debate, click the Add to My Favorites link at the top of the page.