The Instigator
Toored
Pro (for)
Winning
19 Points
The Contender
independentprogressive
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Does kucinich really have extremly large ears?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/23/2007 Category: Politics
Updated: 9 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,090 times Debate No: 870
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (7)

 

Toored

Pro

Before I begin I want to make it clear that I like Kucinich and that this debate is purely about his ears.

The following picture is of Dennis kucinich: http://www.luisprada.com...

The following image is of Dr. Spock: http://magicstatistics.com...

I rest my case.
independentprogressive

Con

Kucinich does have big ears. That is how he listens to everyone!
They aren't extremely, or unnaturally large, just larger than normal.

Now Mr. Obama on the other hand. He's got some wierd ears. Check this out:
http://z.about.com...
Debate Round No. 1
Toored

Pro

Anyones ears look big when you blow up a picture of them.

Mike Gravel has normal ears: http://www.gwu.edu...

Hillary Clinton has normal ears: http://www.4president.us...

Joe Biden has normal ears: http://msnbcmedia4.msn.com...

On the other hand. . .

Spock, Dumbo, and most elves have large ears. So does Dennis Kuchinch. He has large ears and he should be proud of it!

I think our next debate can be "Is this the most pointless debate on debate.org?"
independentprogressive

Con

independentprogressive forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Toored

Pro

In conclusion, we should not mock the mans big hear but praise them. Amen!!! Amen!!! Amen!!! One more time: Amen!!!
independentprogressive

Con

independentprogressive forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by solo 9 years ago
solo
Had independentprogressive continued with this debate he would've had my vote, but I'm just not going to vote. Toored never answered the Con's point of <<They aren't extremely, or unnaturally large, just larger than normal.>>
7 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 7 records.
Vote Placed by U.n 11 months ago
U.n
TooredindependentprogressiveTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture.
Vote Placed by hjfrutwiufy 9 years ago
hjfrutwiufy
TooredindependentprogressiveTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by BastGOP 9 years ago
BastGOP
TooredindependentprogressiveTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by aaronsl 9 years ago
aaronsl
TooredindependentprogressiveTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by Tatarize 9 years ago
Tatarize
TooredindependentprogressiveTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by UberCryxic 9 years ago
UberCryxic
TooredindependentprogressiveTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Vote Placed by iq_two 9 years ago
iq_two
TooredindependentprogressiveTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30