Does the christian god exist?
Debate Rounds (5)
Round two to four-arguements
The one rule for this debate is that is not to be personal.
The best of luck to my opponent.
For my first arguement i would like to use the theorem:
Big Bang -> cause -> ???
Big Bang -> cause -> God -> cause -> ???
It was intended for anti-god but i will use it for pro-god.
"Every Cause has its Effect; every Effect has its Cause; everything happens according to Law; Chance is but a name for Law not recognized; there are many planes of causation, but nothing escapes the Law."
There has to be a cause for something to happen. Since this is so what "caused" god?
My awnser god. God must have created itself. The reason being there was an intent. The universe is matter it doesn't think or do anything. But if there is a mind behind it there is both a reason and cause. Because there is a reason to exist there is a cause.
1. Every being that exists is either contingent or necessary.
2. Not every being can be contingent.
3. Therefore, there exists a necessary being on which the contingent beings depend.
4. A necessary being, on which all contingent things depend, is what we mean by �€""God�€�.
5. Therefore, God exists.
And so god exists.
Arguement 1 part 2--
Since there is a god (supported by part 1) i will now use a priori arguement.
This is the classic ontological, or a priori, argument. It was first articulated in 1070 by St. Anselm, who argued that because we have a conception of an all-perfect being "" which he defined as "that than which nothing greater can be conceived" "" it has to exist. In his essay Proslogion, St. Anselm conceived of God as a being who possesses all conceivable perfection. But if this being "existed" merely as an idea in our minds, then it would be less perfect than if it actually existed. So it wouldn't be as great as a being who actually existed, something that would thus contradict our definition of God "" a being who's supposed to be all-perfect. Thus, God must exist.
Therefore the god that exists must be perfect.
Arguement 1 part 3--
So assume there is anther god(or god) insted of the christian god.
Allah and Elohim -- the gods of Islam and Judaism have pretty much the exact same belief as christians. It is compared here:
Now lets look at the greeko-roman belief -- they made them in thier own image so pretty much they litterally made them up.
The only diffferance between judaism, islam, and christianity is belief in jesus, and what happened in the biblical, tanakh, and quran times. God did not create sin lucifer did in christianity and judaism, but what about islam? Allah created sin. And his creation but cannot enter into the world. Allah is a kind god according to the quran though. I will argue the islam P.O.V. with if he could he would.
Therefore the christian god is the only perfect/pure god.
Conclusion of parts 1, 2, and 3.
Therefore the christian god exists and is the only god.
Your argument for the existence of god is based on two unsubstantiated principles:
1. The A theory of time is correct. That being that
2. Everything that begins to exist has a cause.
Frankly when it comes to whether or not the A theory of time is correct no one really knows but this doesn't mean you can simply assume the validity of the A theory of time. But when it comes to the claim that everything that begins to exist has a cause we know that this is false from quantum mechanics which describes the properties of quantum items as probabilities. It is impossible to know which radioactive atom will decay because it is not cause by anything therefore your model of causation is invalid.
Does the Christian God Exist
Assuming that the bible is an accurate source for the reality of the biblical god (it would be a bit of a contradiction if it wasn't) we encounter some problems:
1. The numerous contradictions:
God is omniscient, God is not omniscient.
God is unchangeable  god is changeable .
God cannot lie  god can lie .
2. It's polytheistic roots:
Yahweh is known to have been a deity of the polytheistic Canaanites .
3. The contradictory properties of Yahweh:
Now no matter what omniscience is impossible, nothing can know everything because every sentient being has to make the three basil assumptions:
The assumption that we experience the universe through our senses,
The assumption that knowledge exists,
The assumption that models with predictive capability are more effective than models with only descriptive capability.
Because these assumptions must be made by every sentient being it is impossible for any being to be omniscient. Therefore because there is a logical impossibility in the definition.
And now for omnipotence. Omnipotence can be shown to be impossible by a very simple question and that is can god create an object that god can't effect? If god cannot create this object then god isn't omnipotent and if god can create this object then god is also not omnipotent because god cannot effect an object.
Now (luckily for me) you constricting this to the Jewish god constricts this debate to this reality in which two statements of fact cannot contradict each other for instance a square cannot also be a circle or a being cannot be all forgiving and order the deaths of thousands.
Now Yahweh is claimed to be both all forgiving  and orders the deaths of hundreds of thousands      . Yahweh is also claimed to be all righteous  and orders the killing of unbelievers .
 1 John 3:20
 Genesis 3:8-13
 James 1:17
 Genesis 6:6
 Hebrews 6:18
 1 Kings 22:23
 CANAANITE MYTH AND HEBREW EPIC by von Frank Moore http://books.google.co.uk...
 Isaiah 30:18
 Judges 21:10-24
 Numbers 31:7-18
 Deuteronomy 20:10-14
 Zechariah 14:1-2
 Deuteronomy 13:13-19
 Exodus 12:29-30
 Job 37:23
 2 Chronicles 15:12-13
1--There is no way of knowing what senses god actually has so therefore the argument of having s"ances that leads to the conclusion of being not omniscient is unsound.
2--Genesis 6.6: And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.
He did not change, he would of already thought that.
3--1 kings 22.23: Now therefore behold, the Lord hath put a lying spirit in the mouths of all these thy prophets
He didn't lie, he sent something to make someone lie. The thing that was lieing already lied, god wasn't/never lied.
Therefore he didn't lie.
4--if you are Christian you understand god's perfect understanding of justice/mercy. He does have mercy but they didn't deserve/want it because their hearts were too hardened. (this is backed up in Argument 1 part 3)
5--killing un-believers is indeed righteous (backed up by Rebuttal 1 part 4 because it is the same question of what is right and wrong which is supported by the same thing (Argument 1 part 3) )
Verdict1--arguement 1 part 2 backs up arguement 1 part 3, and arguement 1 part 2 is backed up by arguement 1 part 1.
A1 --> A2 --> A3 --> rebuttal's/and/verdict
solid arguement in order of support.
Verdict2--About your two unsustainable principals: it is actually one like my Verdict1 statement are for getting to one conclusion which is why it is considered that the absolute base (mine being Arguement 1 part 1) is "innocent until proven guilty", in other words you must prove that it isn't possible/plausible/true for it to be unraveled being its current state.
In other words: it can't be false in an arguement/debate/trial until proven so. You suggest that it could be either or making it so although it already was.
Conclusion: God does indeed exist. (supported by preceding arguement.)
BTW/GG:you are still good at this please do not be insulted.
I understand your workload.
The-Holy-Macrel forfeited this round.
A341 forfeited this round.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.