The Instigator
TrevorQuamily
Pro (for)
Losing
10 Points
The Contender
Itsallovernow
Con (against)
Winning
33 Points

Dog fighting should be aloud

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 8 votes the winner is...
Itsallovernow
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/23/2010 Category: Society
Updated: 6 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 7,951 times Debate No: 13204
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (10)
Votes (8)

 

TrevorQuamily

Pro

Dog fighting should be aloud.
dogs fight in the wild all the time.
why shouldn't people be able to enjoy that.
Itsallovernow

Con

Thank you for the debate.

According to animal laws, there should be a humane treatment of animals, and that is why dog fighting should not be allowed. As a sophisticated society, we Americans do not force other creatures to harm themselves for profit entertainment. We kill them from nessecity, not barbaristic fun.

http://www.americanhumane.org...
Debate Round No. 1
TrevorQuamily

Pro

Dogs fight all the time in the wild. 65% of the american population watches mma.which is people getting paid to fight.aside from the point, its the way champions where bread in the pass yet if you knew anything about the subject you'd know that dogs choose to fight they could submit if they want. Rules.These will insure the safty of dog during the fight.1.Vets must be on the sidelines.2.if they dont want to fight then they dont have to.
And if dogs fight we should find a way to make money of It
Itsallovernow

Con

Thank you for the debate.

1. "Dogs fight in the wild."- They fight in the wild to survive. Domesticated animals do not need to fight for "fun". Dog fights are held until one 'submits', which is usually death.

2. MMA has no relation to why dog fighting should be allowed.

3. "(Rules) insure 'ensure' the saftey of the dogs..." No, they don't.

4. "If they don't want to fight they don't have to." Dogs don't reatain the mental capacity to choose whether or not to fight.
Debate Round No. 2
10 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by bulletdust201 2 years ago
bulletdust201
do u wunna fite bulletdust?u wunna ?!
Posted by bulletdust201 2 years ago
bulletdust201
do u wunna fite bulletdust?
Posted by Itsallovernow 6 years ago
Itsallovernow
Loserboi - In Horseracing, they usually break their legs. If they do, it's usually an accident, and not intentional wounding. It is humane to put them down in case of this accident, and they are usually given a chance to recover, but most do not.

theLwerd - We can't all be on the top leaderboard like you :)

Rockylightning - Well, screw you. I'm learning by experience.
Posted by nonentity 6 years ago
nonentity
Well, making them fight quietly would just be cruel.
Posted by Rockylightning 6 years ago
Rockylightning
This was pathetic.
Posted by Danielle 6 years ago
Danielle
Both debaters were... not exactly convincing.
Posted by Cody_Franklin 6 years ago
Cody_Franklin
"I would actually claim that dog fighting should be kept very quiet; else, the activity risks becoming a disturbance of the peace."
Posted by Loserboi 7 years ago
Loserboi
"As a sophisticated society, we Americans do not force other creatures to harm themselves for profit entertainment. We kill them from nessecity, not barbaristic fun."

Horse Racing... When a horse can no longer race it gets put down
Posted by PARADIGM_L0ST 7 years ago
PARADIGM_L0ST
Spellcheck should be aloud... I mean, "allowed."
Posted by m93samman 7 years ago
m93samman
I want to debate some of these fail debates :/ I never get them
8 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 8 records.
Vote Placed by Whitesox 6 years ago
Whitesox
TrevorQuamilyItsallovernowTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Postup10101 6 years ago
Postup10101
TrevorQuamilyItsallovernowTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by TheAtheistAllegiance 6 years ago
TheAtheistAllegiance
TrevorQuamilyItsallovernowTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Vote Placed by LazerStallion 6 years ago
LazerStallion
TrevorQuamilyItsallovernowTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Rockylightning 6 years ago
Rockylightning
TrevorQuamilyItsallovernowTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:31 
Vote Placed by TrevorQuamily 6 years ago
TrevorQuamily
TrevorQuamilyItsallovernowTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Danielle 6 years ago
Danielle
TrevorQuamilyItsallovernowTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:02 
Vote Placed by Itsallovernow 6 years ago
Itsallovernow
TrevorQuamilyItsallovernowTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07