The Instigator
Stupidape
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
WallflowerDebater
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Dog fightning should be legalized in the USA.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Stupidape
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/6/2016 Category: Sports
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 414 times Debate No: 86167
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

Stupidape

Pro

Stucture
R1. Acceptance and definitions only
R2. Arguments
R3. Rebuttals
R4. Defense of arguments against R3 rebuttals

Will use wikipedia definition for dog fighting. This is the only round to dispute this definition.

"Dog fighting is a type of blood sport generally defined as opposing two game dogs against one another in a ring or a pit for the entertainment of the spectators or the gratification of the dogfighters, who are sometimes referred to as dogmen" [1]

Links
1. https://en.wikipedia.org...


WallflowerDebater

Con

Dog Fighting is illegal in the US because it is a inhumane treatment of a domestic animal. Most dogmen treat their dogs horribly to get them angry. The dogs don't get fed on a regular basis so they are angered to kill anything that stands in their way of food. Dogmen also treat their dogs that have lost even worse because they are loosing money and fame to the dog fighting scene.
Debate Round No. 1
Stupidape

Pro

Economy

Dog fighting will help raise revenues that will help get the USA out of debt. With a debt of about 19 trillion dollars [1] the U.S. needs all the money it can get.

Black Market

Dog fighting is already part of the black market.

Freedom

Prohibiting dog fighting restricts freedom. By allowing dog fighting we help to maximize freedom.

Links

1. http://www.usdebtclock.org...
WallflowerDebater

Con

WallflowerDebater forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
Stupidape

Pro

opponent has ff.
WallflowerDebater

Con

WallflowerDebater forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
Stupidape

Pro

Opponent has ff.
WallflowerDebater

Con

WallflowerDebater forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by U.n 1 year ago
U.n
StupidapeWallflowerDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro cited web links; Con did not (sources vote to Pro). Con forfeited 3 turns; Pro posted all 4 rounds. (conduct point to Pro).