The Instigator
MonstaUndaYoBed
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
Mikal
Con (against)
Winning
16 Points

DotA 2 is better than League of Legends

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
Mikal
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/4/2014 Category: Games
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 604 times Debate No: 62642
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (0)
Votes (5)

 

MonstaUndaYoBed

Pro

The community of DotA 2 is much better than the community of LoL and DotA 2 requires more skill to play than LoL
Mikal

Con

So the only thing I really need to do to win this is a provide a contention. He set this to one round, provided no contentions and blindly just asserted the resolution. HE has the BOP so for him to uphold this, he has to provide some type of contention to support it. Nothing has been presented, so a blind assertion of the resolution is all that we have.

C1) User base

Both user bases have people that rage, get mad, and are all around hard to handle. Leagues however has an entire corporation an fanbase built around riot which is an amazing company that houses an amazing fan base. Anywhere from sponsoring millions of dollars in tournaments to constant customer support, riot is all around the best outlet for a greaet community

C2) Skill

Leagues requires proper timing, proper coordination, better farming, and the ability to function as an individual and as a team. Dota has some of the same aspects but not the the degree that leagues requires

Conclusion

His BOP is not uphel
Debate Round No. 1
No comments have been posted on this debate.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
MonstaUndaYoBedMikalTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's argument's are more superior.
Vote Placed by Narwhalicorn 2 years ago
Narwhalicorn
MonstaUndaYoBedMikalTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro just made a basic statement with no support.
Vote Placed by LDPOFODebATeR0328 2 years ago
LDPOFODebATeR0328
MonstaUndaYoBedMikalTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:14 
Reasons for voting decision: Simple: Pro actually brought up some arguments, while Con did not. S&G to Pro because Con made couple of typos... :P
Vote Placed by Ajabi 2 years ago
Ajabi
MonstaUndaYoBedMikalTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: This is a simple enough vote. Pro had the BoP but could give no objective reason for DOTA 2 to be better. Con pointed this out, and even gave arguments which remained unrefuted. Happy to clarify this rfd.
Vote Placed by Complicated_Mind 2 years ago
Complicated_Mind
MonstaUndaYoBedMikalTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: It's pretty obvious who won this one, I just feel obligated to vote so there's no unfair draw. Con overall provided more stable arguments, and elaborated rather than making a blind assertion as Pro did. Soooo Con wins, end of story.