The Instigator
NiamC
Pro (for)
Winning
15 Points
The Contender
Smriti
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Drawing challenge

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
NiamC
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/18/2014 Category: Arts
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 534 times Debate No: 60611
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (2)
Votes (5)

 

NiamC

Pro

This is an art challenge between my opponent and I.
We will both have to create one art piece
Rules:
1. 1st round is acceptance
2. The pieces shall be presented in Round 2
3. Only HB pencil or slight varients can be used
4. The piece has to be your own creation.
5. The piece can be of any style and size.

Good luck!
Debate Round No. 1
Debate Round No. 2
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by NiamC 2 years ago
NiamC
Why thank you.
Posted by Aerogant 2 years ago
Aerogant
Great art Niam.
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Blade-of-Truth 2 years ago
Blade-of-Truth
NiamCSmritiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: These were great creations from both sides. I believe Pro wins this though. This is due to the complex nature of Pro's truly 3-dimensional image. The shadowing was spot on, the eyes were symetrical and highly detailed. It was the attention to detail and intricacy of capturing the girls emotions in the image. For me, this was a beautiful drawing that, I would say, was almost as if the girl was right in-front of him as he drew this. Con's image was really nice as well. I liked the contrast of the light figure positioned opposite of the shady one. Unfortunately, it just didn't capture the realism and attention to detail that can be seen in Pro's image. It also seemed 2-dimensional whereas Pro's had a sense of depth, literally. For this, I must award the win to Pro.
Vote Placed by Ajabi 2 years ago
Ajabi
NiamCSmritiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: All right here it is: Niam's piece was beautiful. While I thought the arms could do better, it was way more detailed that Smriti and more accurate. Not to let anyone down, both pieces were beyond amazing, but I though Con had more issues which the arms again, and in general it lacked the detail and finesse Niam had. Happy to clarify this RFD,
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
NiamCSmritiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: I loved Con's picture but Pro had much more detail so the debate goes to him.
Vote Placed by RyuuKyuzo 2 years ago
RyuuKyuzo
NiamCSmritiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's was okay, but it didnt match up to the detail and realism exhibited in Pro's work.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
NiamCSmritiTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: con's abstract art was impressive, of course, and even similar to what can only be created on a computer/wall-paper-design, but pro's was really really realistic. It was far too good.