The Instigator
MrMakie
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
David.Cameron
Con (against)
Winning
15 Points

Drugs are bad

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
David.Cameron
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/2/2014 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 566 times Debate No: 66231
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (3)
Votes (3)

 

MrMakie

Pro

First round is acceptance. Drugs are bad M'kay.
David.Cameron

Con

I accept. Richard Dawkins recently tried DMT and it changed his life: http://wundergroundmusic.com...

It can provide other cool experiences. Pro hasn't argued anything yet.
Debate Round No. 1
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by notyourbusiness 2 years ago
notyourbusiness
This one-round "debate" is rather meaningless, with no points or solid arguments.
Posted by WillDC22 2 years ago
WillDC22
It's still better than a simple claim with no false or true evidence surrounding it
Posted by 2Evil 2 years ago
2Evil
Disclaimer

Wunderground is a fictionalized, satirical publication. Its content should in no way be interpreted as an actual record of events, unless a story specifically states that its contents are an actual recording of events. These stories are also not intended to be, nor should they be construed as, attempts to predict the future course of any individual or entity, but should be viewed only as parody. Wunderground is not associated with any other news service. Names used in Wunderground stories, unless those of public figures or entities, are fictional, and any resemblance to actual persons or entities is coincidental, unintentional, and accidental. Any event described in Wunderground that actually comes to pass should also be considered coincidental, unintentional, and accidental. And pretty damned amazing.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
MrMakieDavid.CameronTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: pro did nothing. Conduct becuz this was a one round debate.
Vote Placed by WillDC22 2 years ago
WillDC22
MrMakieDavid.CameronTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: I have to agree that pro kinda did a bad job of this, literally anyone could have looked up an article about drugs not being bad, linked it without even reading it, and maybe fluffed it out, and bam, victory on a silver platter
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 2 years ago
birdlandmemories
MrMakieDavid.CameronTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Sources arguments, and conduct for a one round debate. Con wins.