Dude, you could totally score with Ashley Tisdale.

In this debate, I will set out to prove that CON (who, as a requirement for accepting this debate must be a heterosexual self-identified male or a homosexual self-identified female) can totally "score" with Ashley Tisdale.

I will supply the infrastructure of this debate:

Ashley Tisdale: http://en.wikipedia.org...

The location: A trance/dubstep rave hosted at a mutual friend's seaside villa in Barcelona.

As support, CON will have the assistance of myself and my boy D-Robb who has both a goatee of the soul patch variety and Sevens jeans.

"Score": Consummation. Completion of the sexual act.

I will agree that the usage of "date rape" drugs is forbidden.

Additional terms and questions can be posited by my opponent, in this contingency, Round 2 will be used to agree to final terms.

"In this debate, I will set out to prove that CON (who, as a requirement for accepting this debate must be a heterosexual self-identified male or a homosexual self-identified female) can totally "score" with Ashley Tisdale"
I have Tetraplegia, and my penis was severed in half as a result of an automobile accident. Vote Con, I win by default.

As previously stated in my positing of the debate's infrastructure, Round 2 would be used to debate contingencies introduced by CON in round 1. Knowing CON's physical inadequacies, my boy D-Robb and have procured cyborg parts to replace CON's deficient anatomy, therefore circumventing his tetraplegia and severed penis as obstacles to "scoring" with Mrs. Tisdale.

I should stress that my opponent no longer has leeway to introduce new contingencies to the situation, or to define/ impose infrastructure of any kind.

Good luck.

"Additional terms and questions can be posited by my opponent, in this contingency, Round 2 will be used to agree to final terms" "I should stress that my opponent no longer has leeway to introduce new contingencies to the situation, or to define/ impose infrastructure of any kind."
You have just completely reversed my terms. I do not agree to these terms. There are no cyborg parts to cure my tetraplegia, it is a spinal cord condition that resulted in full paralysis of all four of my limbs.

I'm not sure what this debate actually is, I thought it was kind of a joke debate. It seems now it's a hypothetical "contingency" debate. You just introduced a new contingency. I am new to this site(registered yesterday), if you do not want me to introduce new contingencies, I would hold you to the same standards. Nonetheless, this will be an interesting debate, though if it turns into the above, I'm not sure either of us could win.
Good luck.

Okay... Pro forfeits. I'll start with, my first arguments.

I cannot move my arms or legs, and do not have the reproductive organs necessary to have sex. I'm not sure what I could do with Mrs. Tisdale that would qualify as "sex". I also do not know why she would want to have "sex" with a man lacking these organs. Which leads me to my next argument.

I'm assuming "Mrs. Tisdale" is married. I would never be involved with someone who is cheating on their spouse. Nor would I want to be the guy in the "cheating". I am also married. I will not cheat on my wife. Although I guess that is subjective, since this debate is whether I "could score with ashley tisdale".

Further I do not have the money to go to barcelona, nor do I have the vacation days. Maybe you're wondering how I am capable of working without function of my arms or legs. I am a political advisor to a county executive. Which, in my case, does not require any physical labor of any kind. You might also be wondering how I am typing. I'm not. I'm using a "speech-to-text" device.

I'll start with those arguments, and wait to see what Pro's arguments are.

Pro forfeits again. Arguments extended. I guess he left for Barcelona already.
Vote Con.

Great debate.