The Instigator
ftripier
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
kkjnay
Con (against)
Winning
23 Points

Dude, you could totally score with Ashley Tisdale.

Do you like this debate?NoYes-3
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/8/2011 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 597 times Debate No: 18661
Debate Rounds (5)
Comments (1)
Votes (5)

 

ftripier

Pro

In this debate, I will set out to prove that CON (who, as a requirement for accepting this debate must be a heterosexual self-identified male or a homosexual self-identified female) can totally "score" with Ashley Tisdale.

I will supply the infrastructure of this debate:

Ashley Tisdale: http://en.wikipedia.org...

The location: A trance/dubstep rave hosted at a mutual friend's seaside villa in Barcelona.

As support, CON will have the assistance of myself and my boy D-Robb who has both a goatee of the soul patch variety and Sevens jeans.

"Score": Consummation. Completion of the sexual act.

I will agree that the usage of "date rape" drugs is forbidden.

Additional terms and questions can be posited by my opponent, in this contingency, Round 2 will be used to agree to final terms.
kkjnay

Con

"In this debate, I will set out to prove that CON (who, as a requirement for accepting this debate must be a heterosexual self-identified male or a homosexual self-identified female) can totally "score" with Ashley Tisdale"
I have Tetraplegia, and my penis was severed in half as a result of an automobile accident. Vote Con, I win by default.
Debate Round No. 1
ftripier

Pro

As previously stated in my positing of the debate's infrastructure, Round 2 would be used to debate contingencies introduced by CON in round 1. Knowing CON's physical inadequacies, my boy D-Robb and have procured cyborg parts to replace CON's deficient anatomy, therefore circumventing his tetraplegia and severed penis as obstacles to "scoring" with Mrs. Tisdale.

I should stress that my opponent no longer has leeway to introduce new contingencies to the situation, or to define/ impose infrastructure of any kind.

Good luck.
kkjnay

Con

"Additional terms and questions can be posited by my opponent, in this contingency, Round 2 will be used to agree to final terms" "I should stress that my opponent no longer has leeway to introduce new contingencies to the situation, or to define/ impose infrastructure of any kind."
You have just completely reversed my terms. I do not agree to these terms. There are no cyborg parts to cure my tetraplegia, it is a spinal cord condition that resulted in full paralysis of all four of my limbs.

I'm not sure what this debate actually is, I thought it was kind of a joke debate. It seems now it's a hypothetical "contingency" debate. You just introduced a new contingency. I am new to this site(registered yesterday), if you do not want me to introduce new contingencies, I would hold you to the same standards. Nonetheless, this will be an interesting debate, though if it turns into the above, I'm not sure either of us could win.
Good luck.
Debate Round No. 2
ftripier

Pro

ftripier forfeited this round.
kkjnay

Con

Okay... Pro forfeits. I'll start with, my first arguments.

I cannot move my arms or legs, and do not have the reproductive organs necessary to have sex. I'm not sure what I could do with Mrs. Tisdale that would qualify as "sex". I also do not know why she would want to have "sex" with a man lacking these organs. Which leads me to my next argument.

I'm assuming "Mrs. Tisdale" is married. I would never be involved with someone who is cheating on their spouse. Nor would I want to be the guy in the "cheating". I am also married. I will not cheat on my wife. Although I guess that is subjective, since this debate is whether I "could score with ashley tisdale".

Further I do not have the money to go to barcelona, nor do I have the vacation days. Maybe you're wondering how I am capable of working without function of my arms or legs. I am a political advisor to a county executive. Which, in my case, does not require any physical labor of any kind. You might also be wondering how I am typing. I'm not. I'm using a "speech-to-text" device.

I'll start with those arguments, and wait to see what Pro's arguments are.
Debate Round No. 3
ftripier

Pro

ftripier forfeited this round.
kkjnay

Con

Pro forfeits again. Arguments extended. I guess he left for Barcelona already.
Vote Con.
Debate Round No. 4
ftripier

Pro

ftripier forfeited this round.
kkjnay

Con

Great debate.
Debate Round No. 5
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by waylon.fairbanks 2 years ago
waylon.fairbanks
Haha, pretty funny debate. But if I can actually score with her, what are we waiting for? Next stop Barcelona!
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by Zarroette 3 months ago
Zarroette
ftripierkkjnayTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: ff
Vote Placed by Spritle 2 years ago
Spritle
ftripierkkjnayTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Crypto247 2 years ago
Crypto247
ftripierkkjnayTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by jm_notguilty 2 years ago
jm_notguilty
ftripierkkjnayTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: 4feet
Vote Placed by randolph7 2 years ago
randolph7
ftripierkkjnayTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF