The Instigator
BlueandRed
Pro (for)
Losing
3 Points
The Contender
KingDebater
Con (against)
Winning
13 Points

Eat your chicken.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
KingDebater
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/1/2014 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,016 times Debate No: 43221
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (18)
Votes (3)

 

BlueandRed

Pro

You should eat your live chicken.
KingDebater

Con

You shouldn't because chickens are very vicious and they'll rip your face off!

Thank you.

P.S. are you Stalin by any chance?






Debate Round No. 1
BlueandRed

Pro

I am not STALIN, I don't know who that is.

Those people in the video's you posted had very bad strategies and were not friendly.

Thank you for accepting this debate. :)






KingDebater

Con

Pro only gave 2 video clips, I gave 5. Talk about cherry-picking!

But here's the point - if you type "friendly chickens" into Youtube, you get 36,700 results (1). However, if you type in "vicious chickens" there are 48,800 results (2); that's a difference of 12,100!

We still haven't considered that making a video of a chicken attacking a human isn't a very nice thing to do. Therefore, the ratio of people making videos of vicious chickens to existing vicious chickens will be lower than the ratio of people making videos of friendly chickens to existing friendly chickens. It takes a special kind of lunatic to capture a video of a chicken attacking somebody. Therefore, it's way more likely that a chicken will rip your face off or commit other similar violent acts when you try to eat it live. If chickens are vicious normally, then when you're about to gobble them live they must be super vicious.

Pro insults the people featured in the videos I put in my round one argument. However, they're just doing very normal things when all of a sudden, a typically violent chicken attacks them. Prior to the attack, the people are:
1. Approaching the chicken
2. Moving their hand slowly closer to the chicken, probably to pet it.
3. Trying to feed it

All of those are perfectly normal things.

Also, it has been proven that there are lots of dangers in eating raw meat (3).

Thank you.

Sources
(1) http://www.youtube.com...
(2)http://www.youtube.com...;
(3) Sammarco, M.L., Ripabelli G., Grasso, G.M. “Consumer Attitude and Awareness towards Food-relate Hygienic Hazards.” pp. 81–90
Debate Round No. 2
BlueandRed

Pro

BlueandRed forfeited this round.
KingDebater

Con

Chances are, pro forfeited because he's now dead. His cause of death was "Got his face ripped off by a chicken after trying to eat said chicken".

Thank you.
Debate Round No. 3
18 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by birdlandmemories 2 years ago
birdlandmemories
Come back Elkingdebatoro!
Posted by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
You called her a toddler.
Posted by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
Name one time I've done that
Posted by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
Um, yeah. Kingdebater, you did insult her a lot of times.
Posted by Anon_Y_Mous 3 years ago
Anon_Y_Mous
If BlueandRed has never heard of STALIN, why did they change the capitalization from Stalin(which is the form that KingDebater used) to STALIN?
Posted by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
@kawaii_crazy When have I ever insulted you? Also, you are not 'other members'
Posted by kawaii_crazy 3 years ago
kawaii_crazy
hundreds of times. to me
Posted by KingDebater 3 years ago
KingDebater
@kawaii_crazy That is called a list.

"Insulting other members" - When have I done this?
Posted by kawaii_crazy 3 years ago
kawaii_crazy
These are your sentence fragments:
1. Approaching the chicken
2. Moving their hand slowly closer to the chicken, probably to pet it.
3. Trying to feed it
and my vote didn't make much of a difference anyway 'cause you both got two more points. and im reporting you for insulting other members.
Posted by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
@kingdebater. I'm pretty sure calling her a "white toddler girl" doesn't help much.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by birdlandmemories 3 years ago
birdlandmemories
BlueandRedKingDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:15 
Reasons for voting decision: Sources and arguments to con since he had videos for sources, and had decent arguments that were never refuted. I'm going to give pro conduct though because con was partially rude in the debate, then went over the line in the comments section. Advice to pro: create a more detailed topic. Because that way, it will less likely be trolled.
Vote Placed by kawaii_crazy 3 years ago
kawaii_crazy
BlueandRedKingDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:22 
Reasons for voting decision: Con had more videos and sources. Pro did not say con's face was ripped off by an angry chicken. Con wrote various fragments.
Vote Placed by MassiveDump 3 years ago
MassiveDump
BlueandRedKingDebaterTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: This is the single worst debate ever. Not counting the ones where both sides forfeit, this one has all the fixin's for a perfectly Godawful debate. Ridiculous topic, lack of coherent arguments (until Con in round 2), and worst of all, Size five Comic Sans. Arguments is an easy point to assign, because the only argument given was Con's counter-plan. Not only that, but because Pro proved that chickens are friendly, it makes me want to eat them even less. Now, I just want one as a pet. Sources because Con had some. If I could assign negative spelling points for the Comic Sans, believe me, I would. Terrible debate, guys. Great job, it was immensely hilarious. Oh, yeah. And conduct for the forfeit.