The Instigator
Pro (for)
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
7 Points

Education for children is necessary

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/20/2015 Category: Education
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 564 times Debate No: 75562
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (1)
Votes (1)




If education for children will not be there, so for future upcoming doctors, engineers,architect, lower, how it will be. the country will be going downards.


At the age of 16 you can leave home without your parents consent. If you're no longer dependent upon your parents, then you're an adult [1].

Children are between the ages of 4 to 13 or 14. At 15, 16, and 17 you're classed as a young adult. At 18 you're an adult, definitely not a child

Pro must prove why school education's important to become a doctor etc despite being able to take G.C.S.E's much later in life.


[1 ]
Debate Round No. 1


anudeb forfeited this round.


My opponent has failed to make an argument making this easy for me. It is not necessary for budding engineers, doctors etc to gain a good education at a young age because. Higher education is accessible for any adult no matter their level of education, and universities offer courses which students often have or need no prior knowledge of when starting.
Debate Round No. 2
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by blackkid 3 years ago
... Who would be dumb enough to accept this?
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by Schuman8rr 3 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct - Pro forfeited a round so conduct goes to Con. Grammar - Pro has one sentence and that sentence is a fragment. Arguments - As Pro forfeited he did not refute a single argument made by Con which counts as dropped arguments. Sources - Con did use 1 source to Pro's 0.