Debate Rounds (5)
First round is for your first argument.
What is the debate about?
Do you mean "The World is better without Iran"
Is this restricted to modern day?
What are you showing?
I do not believe that sex (f***) is the correct response to Iran's terrorism. I dont even think sex with a country is possible. I mean you might be in to that terrorism stuff but the logistics of it do not add up. There are better ways of dealing with terrorism than having sex with Iran.
Vote for my argument if you think it is impractical to deal with terrorism by having sex with Iran.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by cathaystewie 1 year ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: All PRO did was essentially assert the statement "Eff Iran" which is frankly a very hollow claim seeing that PRO did not use any of the latter rounds to prove this and draw the connection between terrorism and the necessity to 'Eff' Iran (whether that refers to the sexual act or an exclamation of contempt is still unclear). Instead, he/she used those rounds to demand clarification from CON which is ironic seeing that that is PRO's job. Conduct goes to CON because PRO resorted to ad hominem. Also, if PRO wishes to use his first round as an acceptance round then CON should follow suit and not have to post their opening arguments by order of PRO.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.