The Instigator
becasue
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
1Devilsadvocate
Pro (for)
Winning
19 Points

Employer useing facebook to hire

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 3 votes the winner is...
1Devilsadvocate
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/15/2013 Category: Technology
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 834 times Debate No: 29243
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (3)

 

becasue

Con

I belive employer should not be able to use facebook to hire because it is invadind if they have you login info
1Devilsadvocate

Pro

I don't even know what you think you might be trying to say.

For starters " invadind" is not a word.

At 1st I thought you meant invalid, but after goggling the word it occurred to me that you mean invading.

If you give it to them, what's the problem?
Debate Round No. 1
becasue

Con

becasue forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
becasue

Con

becasue forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
No comments have been posted on this debate.
3 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Vote Placed by DoctorDeku 3 years ago
DoctorDeku
becasue1DevilsadvocateTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit
Vote Placed by likespeace 3 years ago
likespeace
becasue1DevilsadvocateTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: The Instigator presented no evidence and/or arguments in support of their resolution. Also, Con had more typos total and per line and those made it hard to understand him, plus he forfeited.
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 3 years ago
bladerunner060
becasue1DevilsadvocateTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeit