The Instigator
provideoman123
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
DeuceKaboose
Con (against)
Winning
18 Points

Enact A Racist Ban On Burger King

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
DeuceKaboose
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/23/2015 Category: Society
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 568 times Debate No: 78977
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (5)
Votes (4)

 

provideoman123

Pro

Hello to all, I am known as provideoman123, Master Debater.

During my few visits to the American restaurant chain and franchise known as Burger King, I have had mostly positive encounters. However there were some groups of people who always made the experience there unpleasant and uncomfortable. I am proposing adding a security guard to the door of such establishments, to prevent certain groups of people from entering. This is not done to offend the person, but rather to enhance the experience of the diners inside who are allowed.

I would like to extend this ban to the people of the following nations:

- Bosnia
- Croatia
- Albania
- Kosovo Revolters
- Montenegro
- Romania
- Hungary
- Ukraine
- Turkey
- Turkmenistan
- Azerbaijan

I will allow American people to enter as they are the creator of the Burger King franchise.

Rules: This is a friendly debate, so please accept my opinion as fact and we can have a discussion.
DeuceKaboose

Con

Alright to start off, I don't generally feel sorry for laws that may be harsh on Corporations, but adding a security guard to the doors would cost a chain which has almost 13k restaurants insane amounts, significantly slashing their profits
http://www.statista.com...

Now, presuming you live in the US (which you may not) all those ethnic groups you listed make a very small dent of the population to the point where they are hardly noticeable, if existent at all in most parts (with the exception of 3rd or 4th generation immigrants)

- http://www.dhs.gov...

It would also lead to public outcry over the racist ban and less people would go and eat at burger kings, further slashing profits. There is also questionable legality to it

Now as for security guards, This could possibly create cases of burger kings security guards Harassing people for no legitimate reasons or even possibly injuring/killing civilians.

Banning people from burger king is idiotic and would severely damage burger king
Debate Round No. 1
provideoman123

Pro

provideoman123 forfeited this round.
DeuceKaboose

Con

So, are you going to post a counter-argument?
Debate Round No. 2
provideoman123

Pro

provideoman123 forfeited this round.
DeuceKaboose

Con

My opponent can not even make any form of counter argument

He should hopefully have one next round
Debate Round No. 3
provideoman123

Pro

provideoman123 forfeited this round.
DeuceKaboose

Con

My opponent was unable to make even a single counter-argument to any of my points and forfeited every round

Vote Con
Debate Round No. 4
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by lol101 1 year ago
lol101
@Robert, he has now won one debate.
Posted by The-Voice-of-Truth 1 year ago
The-Voice-of-Truth
Welcome back, Mr. Dumber-Than-Thou.
Posted by Sarra 1 year ago
Sarra
Burger King is a Canadian restaurant chain.
http://www.nydailynews.com...
Posted by ADHDavid 1 year ago
ADHDavid
I do not agree with robertacollier, as provideoman123 has proven time and time again that he is indeed superior. He uses his own facts, which are superior, as he is superior.
Posted by robertacollier 1 year ago
robertacollier
Pro said in his first round: "so please accept my opinion as fact and we can have a discussion."

Pretty easy to see why you have not won a single debate. I surprised you actually tied in some debates. Probably people who never finished them.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by BLAHthedebator 1 year ago
BLAHthedebator
provideoman123DeuceKabooseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by Unbelievable.Time 1 year ago
Unbelievable.Time
provideoman123DeuceKabooseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: FF and arguments by Con still stand
Vote Placed by darthebearnc 1 year ago
darthebearnc
provideoman123DeuceKabooseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
provideoman123DeuceKabooseTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture