The world cup is a global event happening every 4 years. This year the world cup is going to be held in Brazil. The England National Team will finally achieve their second world cup this year because of their superiority in technique, having the best manager and a good mix of young and experienced players.
Your arguments are invalid and subjective. Their manager is the 'best' manager? That is just an opinion and cannot guarantee that England will win. Also, many other teams have a mixture of new and experienced players, so why does England stand out? Countries such as Brazil, Spain, Portugal, ITALY, and many other countries have as much potential as England, if not more. When was the last time England won a world cup? 1966!
Let's talk about the team. Brazil is a team that is heavily dependent on Neymar, who might not even shine infront of home crowd. Same goes for Suarez (Uruguay) and Ronaldo (Portugal). Spain, Germany and Italy have ageing players and it looks like it's going to go downhill. Spain has even put in an injured player in their team from the lack of talent. England, however, is not dependent on one player. They have a wide variety of players who cover a lot of ground on the pitch. We have trust in our young players, half the team is under 25, and we also have experience in Gerrard and Lampard.