All Big Issues
The Instigator
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

# Eternal life is existing

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1

Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
 Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point Started: 3/19/2015 Category: Science Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period Viewed: 525 times Debate No: 71996
Debate Rounds (3)

 Pro The basic premise proceeds from the assumption that the probability of a world coming into existence exactly like our own is greater than zero (we know this because our world exists). If space is infinite, then cosmology tells us that our existence will recur an infinite number of times. We also know for a fact that we are made of atoms and particles. Giving infinite time and space, there will eventually be same atoms and particles IN SAME ORDER, therefore our existence is cyclical and not linear. My opponent will need to explain why there shouldn't be an infinite and eternal universe rather than finite one. Speaking of logic, the only reasonable answer would be that we indeed are living in an eternal and infinite space, where big bangs are occurring infinitely without need for cause. This would also explain the 'free will' problem. Space doesn't care what you think. Its a random generation of algorithms that will make all possible outcomes reality. For an example; I'm president of US in a parallel universe. And in another universe I'm living in a world where star wars really happened. So according to the eternal return theory, we do not have free will.Report this Argument Con Eternal life does not make sense. If everyone had eternal life, then where did every single person on this Earth come from. First, if people were really living an eternal life, then why do we see people die? If eternal life was true, then no one would be dead, therefor, eternal life cannot be true at all. Second, death is a huge thing in most people life. Satan and Lucifer are beliefs that have arisen because of death. If people lived forever, then the figures of death would not be true. Third, decomposition of remains is also another argument against eternal life. People over time decompose, and they are left as skeletons. Eternal life is proven wrong by this because it is not possible, because the remains of the human would not decompose from the body.Report this Argument Pro Everything suggests that we may live in a multiverse. This is backed up by most modern scientists. If we indeed live in a multiverse, it will indicate that not only there is a infinite number of 'you' out there, but it will also make you immortal. Multiverse would also explain dark matter, big bang etc. It would explain gravity as well as infinite and eternal inflation. The multiverse also means that you and me will live again after we die, because the atoms and particles that you are made of, will EVENTUALLY be the same out somewhere in the space and they will fall in the same order thus making you really YOU again. I will suggest you to read 'Eternal return by Nietzsche.Report this Argument Con He8it0412 forfeited this round. Pro My opponent has clearly backed out due to lack of arguments.Report this Argument Con He8it0412 forfeited this round.
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by vi_spex 2 years ago
life is nature, so there is no, before life
No votes have been placed for this debate.