Europeans are superior to everyone else.
Debate Rounds (4)
The BOP is on my opponent that G-d exists and that He created everyone equally. In additon, the opinions of them should not matter more than anyone else, but that does not mean they are not superior to everyone else. For example, just because someone has a better debate Elo ranking doesn't mean their opinion should be heard more than someone else, but it does mean he is a better debater. I also ask my opponent what exactly does he mean by superior? Like sports, work, looks?
Shouldn't everyone's opinion's count?
Thank you my opponet for your response. Once again, my opponent has not supported anything he said in this round as well as last round. Now he needs to prove that European knowledge and technology are everywhere. And if this is true, there is probably a good reason, because their knowledge and technology is superior.
"this system is totally unfair, because this makes Europeans think that they should have more power than everyone else, which led to African slavery in the U.S. in the 1800 and 1900's."
The BOP is on my opponent to prove both of these things.
"Shouldn't everyone's opinion's count?"
I have already addressed this, everybody's opinion should count but that does not mean that Europeans are not superior to everyone else.
Also, my opponent has not addressed any of my arguments; just added new ones
"Thank you my opponet for your response."-spelling and grammar point.
And by the way, you didn't really HAVE any arguments in the first place.
"spelling and grammar point."
As fun as vote pandering is, it is not a debate point.
"God created us all equally, so why should the opinions and ways of Europeans matter more than someone from another culture's?"
Should I vote pander for my opponent using a run on sentence as his entire argument and using an apostrophe incorrectly?
Conclusion: My opponent has not refuted any of my refutations. I completely dismantled his arguments. My opponent has not proved that G-d exists. He did not prove that G-d created everyone equally like he claimed. I thank my opponent for debating and the voters for reading, but I urge a vote for pro.
Ps: I am not racist just took this for fun to challenge myself.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by bladerunner060 4 years ago
|Agreed with before the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Agreed with after the debate:||-||-||0 points|
|Who had better conduct:||-||-||1 point|
|Had better spelling and grammar:||-||-||1 point|
|Made more convincing arguments:||-||-||3 points|
|Used the most reliable sources:||-||-||2 points|
|Total points awarded:||0||4|
Reasons for voting decision: This was a (IMHO) dumb debate, established on dumb premises. While I think most people would agree with Con, that there is nothing inherent to Europeans that makes them "superior to everyone else", the arguments presented by Con were bad. Pro makes the valid point that Con is the one making the initial assertion, and so therefore has the burden of establishing it; had Con said in the beginning that the BOP would be shared, things would be different, but Con didn't, so it's not. Con did not support the assertion, and Pro fairly effectively dismantled what arguments Con actually made, so Con's assertion fails. Conduct to Con for Pro's pandering and insult in R4. However, Lal36, that was neither a runon sentence nor a misuse of an apostrophe, so I give S&G a Tie (one typo doesn't seem enough to rate a point, though it is a short debate). No sources to speak of.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.