The Instigator
askarali
Pro (for)
Winning
3 Points
The Contender
Tursunova_Malika
Con (against)
Losing
0 Points

Euthanasia

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 8/30/2011 Category: Health
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 881 times Debate No: 18113
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)

 

askarali

Pro

Euthanasia means taking someone` s life to stop his suffering. Why should we do this? People have chance to life without pain and this life will be given after his death. Why people should suffer from their illnesses? It is immoral not to give them to die if they want. Someone says that it is suicide but you do not know what it means. Every day wake up with pain and stay in bed every day and suffer. It is not normal thing.
If he or she wants to die it is only their choice and we cannot say that it is wrong thing. Some people start to think that they are gods and try to keep these people alive but it is sadism for people who are ill. People stop and think why ill people should suffer all their life? They know that they will die in pain. Why they will die this way if they have chance to have a normal and good death?
Tursunova_Malika

Con

Euthanasia during years is very debateble issue. But we see that more coutries against legalization euthanasia. And there are a lot of reasons why mostly all world exept 3 or 4 coutriest do not support euthanasia. Firstly we should think about consequences of legalization of right to die. You know that drug used by doctors for kill someone cost about $50 but treatment cost thousands of dollars. Legalization of euthanazia brigns to non-volantary die, when relatives or other close people will ask doctors to kill patient because they do not want spend money for treatment.
Debate Round No. 1
askarali

Pro

You said that all will depend on cost but do you think about money which they will pay for treatment which will have no result. For example people who have cancer, they know that they will die and why they will lose this money for treatment without result. They can give this money to their children or person who they love. And now we have question. Why people should suffer and spend their money without reason?

It seems like something immoral I know, but if you think very well, in the end advantages of euthanasia will be more than disadvantages. No one on the Earth is God and this choice of being alive depends on understanding of people who want to have euthanasia. It is only the way how people can die and it is death without pain and without thought that you spend all your money without purpose.
Tursunova_Malika

Con

I do not think that patients who have terminally ill spend money for treatment without any purpose. If hospitals will lose this money, hospitals will not have enough resources for improve medicine at all. You sopposed to know that drugs and treatment for more serious illnesses cost more expensive. And if government will allow euthanasia hospital workers, doctors and scientists will not work hard, because of lack of finance, to discover treatment and drugs for terminally patients.
Debate Round No. 2
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by philochristos 4 years ago
philochristos
askaraliTursunova_MalikaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: I'd like to take spelling and grammar away from both of you, but I can't. Con ignored Pro's arguments, but Pro at least tried to address Con's arguments.