The Instigator
eightsquare
Pro (for)
Tied
0 Points
The Contender
iamsu
Con (against)
Tied
0 Points

Euthanasia

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 0 votes the winner is...
It's a Tie!
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 10/19/2013 Category: Health
Updated: 3 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 358 times Debate No: 39156
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (1)
Votes (0)

 

eightsquare

Pro

First round for acceptance only.
iamsu

Con

I accept...
Debate Round No. 1
eightsquare

Pro

First of all, euthanasia is only used when patients have no chance of getting better. Euthanasia is a much better option than letting a person suffer unbearable pain with no hope of getting better. The person's family members also do not have to watch the person suffer any more.
Secondly, keeping a terminally ill person alive costs a lot of money. That money can be used to save others who have a chance of getting better.
Ultimately, there is no point of living if there is no possibility of happiness in the future and there is only pain and suffering to follow.
iamsu

Con

iamsu forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
eightsquare

Pro

Vote pro.
iamsu

Con

iamsu forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
eightsquare

Pro

eightsquare forfeited this round.
iamsu

Con

iamsu forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by iamsu 3 years ago
iamsu
con ,u r the winner and I will vote....
No votes have been placed for this debate.