Debate Rounds (5)
It is a practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain.
According to the Bible, God created all living beings and thus, He is the only one capable of taking it back.
Since we ARE not God, we are not allowed to take one's life.
Voluntary Euthanasia means one asked the patient's consent about it.
You claimed that "by removing the machines it would also ease a person's heart the same as saving all of the expenses".
You cannot simply do that without asking the patient about it first.
What if the patient chose to live and still wishes to fight, you cannot do Euthanasia.
Even though the patient suffers from the illness or for whatever reason for being in the hospital, you need his/her
You did not have specific examples to prove your claim.
"same as dead since a proper living human is capable of breathing, start a conversation, and most of all can stand with his two feet."
True, but also false. You need the consent of the patient regarding Euthanasia. Since in that statement you said that you cannot have a conversation with the patient due to the fact that he/she is the same as dead, does mean you cannot ask his/her consent. If you do Euthanasia without the consent of the patient that is considered an involuntary Euthanasia which is the same as MURDER.
And commiting murder is a sin.
It would never be a sin since the one who's taking him is God. Life is a big word.
"the decision would pass through the relative of the patient"
What made you say this? Have you encountered Euthanasia already? Have you been in a hospital with a relative
Of yours that is on the verge of dying and you cannot ask for his consent anymore?
You don't have enough examples or anything that supports your argument.
"time pass quickly.... What is the other option then?"
True, but if you cannot ask for the patient's consent, it is still involuntary Euthanasia and is still considered MURDER.
"it would never be a sin..... Big word"
It is a sin because the patient have not decided upon the matter yet.
Also, Many doctors would disapprove this since it is the contrary to the vocation of medicine to hasten or cause death.
In all cases, medical or non-medical, taking human life should be a last resort, and until our society has given appropriate attention to pain control, hospice care, and advance directive, doctors will not have met the criteria of last resort with respect to legalized euthanasia.
That is all, after all there is no right or wrong answers in a debate. It just depends on how one answers the question and backs it up with examples and sources. I thank again my opponent for this debate.
By ending this argument, Yes, I have no resources nor facts or any specific details to prove my judgement, but it really depends on the person and the family to decide such fate, if they would turn the machines off it means they have not yet Accepted the death pf their love ones then eventually they would undergo this process. At the End it will still be the same, Death will still come.
Just Live Your Life.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.