Euthanasia
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Jedi4
Voting Style: | Open | Point System: | 7 Point | ||
Started: | 9/9/2014 | Category: | Science | ||
Updated: | 3 years ago | Status: | Post Voting Period | ||
Viewed: | 517 times | Debate No: | 61484 |
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (0)
Votes (1)
Euthanasia shows a lack of confidence in the progress of medical science. The doctors job is to end the pain not their life. Killing is not caring.
Sometimes people need to die if they want to. Its their lives. Aaaaand sometimes its for the greater good who wants to take care of this bag of bones Hes creepy. *shudder* |
![]() |
But what about those who have been killed without their consent. There are doctors who have done that. How is that in any way right?
It can be good because its for the greater good. Keeping someone alive can strain resources from others and cost money that could lead to the deaths of others. They need to die for the greater good |
![]() |
Crystaal_07 forfeited this round.
The Cons forfeited. I think they gots the euthanised. |
![]() |
Post a Comment
No comments have been posted on this debate.
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by lannan13 3 years ago
Crystaal_07 | Jedi4 | Tied | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Agreed with before the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
Agreed with after the debate: | ![]() | - | - | 0 points |
Who had better conduct: | - | ![]() | - | 1 point |
Had better spelling and grammar: | - | - | ![]() | 1 point |
Made more convincing arguments: | - | - | ![]() | 3 points |
Used the most reliable sources: | - | - | ![]() | 2 points |
Total points awarded: | 0 | 1 |
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture