The Instigator
Pro (for)
3 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points

Evolution is the reason for our existence.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 1 vote the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 9/7/2013 Category: Science
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 983 times Debate No: 37456
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (2)
Votes (1)




In this debate I will try to prove to Con that evolution is a better reason for our existence than creationism.

First round will be for acceptance.


In fact, your claims are either of these three hypotheses, or perhaps all of them, aren't they? First, the laws of nature are the causes of all beings. Second, all that exist happens to exist by themselves, self replication or self creation. Third, things happen as the causes and effects for one another. I will try to prove that all these are illogical and impossible for an individual with an intelectual mind.
Debate Round No. 1


I would like to thank to my oponent for accepting this debate.

So in this debate I will explain why Evolution a better reason for our existance than Creationism.

I will start by explaining what "Evolution" and "Creationism" mean. I will directly paste what is said in wikipedia.


Evolution is the change in the inherited characteristics of biological populations over successive generations. Evolutionary processes give rise to diversity at every level of biological organisation, including species, individual organisms and molecules such as DNA and proteins.[1]
All life on Earth is descended from a last universal ancestor that lived approximately 3.8 billion years ago. Repeated speciation and the divergence of life can be inferred from shared sets of biochemical and morphological traits, or by shared DNA sequences.[2] These homologous traits and sequences are more similar among species that share a more recent common ancestor, and can be used to reconstruct evolutionary histories, using both existing species and the fossil record. Existing patterns of biodiversity have been shaped both by speciation and by extinction.[3]
Charles Darwin was the first to formulate a scientific argument for the theory of evolution by means of natural selection. Evolution by natural selection is a process that is inferred from three facts about populations: 1) more offspring are produced than can possibly survive, 2) traits vary among individuals, leading to different rates of survival and reproduction, and 3) trait differences are heritable.[4] Thus, when members of a population die they are replaced by the progeny of parents that were better adapted to survive and reproduce in the environment in which natural selection took place. This process creates and preserves traits that are seemingly fitted for the functional roles they perform.[5] Natural selection is the only known cause of adaptation, but not the only known cause of evolution. Other, nonadaptive causes of evolution include mutation and genetic drift.[6]
In the early 20th century, genetics was integrated with Darwin's theory of evolution by natural selection through the discipline of population genetics. The importance of natural selection as a cause of evolution was accepted into other branches of biology. Moreover, previously held notions about evolution, such as orthogenesis and "progress" became obsolete.[7] Scientists continue to study various aspects of evolution by forming and testing hypotheses, constructing scientific theories, using observational data, and performing experiments in both the field and the laboratory. Biologists agree that descent with modification is one of the most reliably established facts in science.[8] Discoveries in evolutionary biology have made a significant impact not just within the traditional branches of biology, but also in other academic disciplines (e.g., anthropology and psychology) and on society at large.[9][10]


reationism is the religious belief that life, the Earth, and the universe are the creation of a supernatural being. As science developed during the 18th century and forward, various views aimed at reconciling science with the Abrahamic creation narrative developed in Western societies.[1] Those holding that species had been created separately (such as Philip Gosse in 1847) were generally called "advocates of creation" but were also called "creationists", as in private correspondence between Charles Darwin and his friends. As the creation"evolution controversy developed over time, the term "anti-evolutionists" became common. In 1929 in the United States, the term "creationism" first became associated with Christian fundamentalists, specifically with their rejection of human evolution and belief in a young Earth"although this usage was contested by other groups, such as old Earth creationists and evolutionary creationists, who hold different concepts of creation.[2][3][4]
Today, the American Scientific Affiliation recognizes that there are different opinions among creationists on the method of creation, while acknowledging unity on the Abrahamic belief that God "created the universe."[5][6] Since the 1920s, literalist creationism in America has contested scientific theories, such as that of evolution,[7][8][9] which derive from natural observations of the universe and life. Literalist creationists[10] believe that evolution cannot adequately account for the history, diversity, and complexity of life on Earth.[11] Fundamentalist creationists of the Christian faith usually base their belief on a literal reading of the Genesis creation narrative.[10][12] Other religions have different deity-led creation myths,[note 1][13][14][15] while different members of individual faiths vary in their acceptance of scientific findings.
When scientific research produces empirical evidence and theoretical conclusions which contradict a literalist creationist interpretation of scripture, young earth creationists often reject the conclusions of the research[16] or its underlying scientific theories[17] or its methodology.[18] The rejection of scientific findings has sparked political and theological controversy.[7] Two offshoots of creationism"creation science and intelligent design"are pseudoscience.[19] The most notable disputes concern the evolution of living organisms, the idea of common descent, the geological history of the Earth, the formation of the solar system and the origin of the universe.[20][21][22][23]
Theistic evolution reconciles theistic religious beliefs with scientific findings on the age of the Earth and the process of evolution. It includes a range of beliefs, including views described as evolutionary creationism and some forms of old earth creationism, all of which embrace the findings of modern science and uphold classical religious teachings about God and creation.[24][25]

By the looks of it you are supporting "Creationism" which means you think that there is a magical supernatural humanoid somewhere that created everything including all planets and living creatures just because of us, humans. This does not make any sense to me since there is no evidence about such an event.

1. the fossil record of change in earlier species
2.the chemical and anatomical similarities of related life forms
3.the geographic distribution of related species
4. the recorded genetic changes in living organisms over many generations

Those 4 things alone that I just pointed are enough to prove that evolution has evidence. I don't see any good evidence in creationism and without evidence you can't claim that something is true.


Rabia1997 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2


I am skipping this round since my opponent fortified.


Rabia1997 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3


Rabia1997 forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by leandro.sanchez 5 years ago
what do you mean our existenz if you mean our to be us humans than yes evolution is the best explanation if you consider us humans to be flesh and blod.if you consider us a soul inside a bodie than creationism is the best explanation.
But if our existenz you mean all living beings.than evolution is not the answer because evolution never claims to be the answer to the origin of live.evolution is a theory of how life evolved from less evolved life forms to the more complicated life forms that we see today.
Posted by TheEnergyHippo 5 years ago
Come on post something :D
1 votes has been placed for this debate.
Vote Placed by johnlubba 5 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:30 
Reasons for voting decision: ff