The Instigator
Pro (for)
8 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
0 Points


Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/24/2012 Category: Science
Updated: 4 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 550 times Debate No: 20630
Debate Rounds (4)
Comments (3)
Votes (2)




First round acceptance. I argue evolution is more than likely happening/happened. Good luck :)


Astronaut even proved that evolution is wrong by going on the moon.
Debate Round No. 1


Ok... Thanks for the opening statement.

C1: modern examples

One example is the flu. It evolves often to outmaneuver (or try to) human immunity. The avian flu evolves rapidly. (1) viruses all evolve quickly, and acquire genetic variation. (1)

One example.

Influenza has many generic changes every flu season, and evolves every year. (2)

Now I will use HIV.

HIV is one of the fastest evolving entities known to man. (3)
It evolves so quikley it evolves out of our treatments (3)

3 examples.

There are current examples of evolution in humans. (3) with some humans moving to higher altitudes othere generations are evolving with higher altitude tolerance. (3)
There are also brain size evolutions among humans found in 2006 & 7. (4)

C2: early proof

Fossil record changes (5)
Chemical similarities in life forms (5)
Geographic distributaion among species (5)
Genetic changes from generation to generation (5)


I will cp the next part:

Species have the ability to produce more offspring than is necessary to replace themselves (superfecundity)
There is a finite pool of resources that is smaller than necessary to allow all offspring to survive
Natural populations are of constant size (over the long term)
Individuals within a species vary in many characteristics
Much of that variation is heritable" (6)

That was the early evidence. See. 6 source for rest.

C3: empirical evidence

Common decent is one argument for evolution, and Darwin and others prove it, in Darwin, 1872 pp
312-317 he explains this theory. (7) Also a more recent person, Gould 2002. Their thesis and conclusions say everything is geologically linked.

Although evolution is a theory, we are arguing probability, BOP probably fairly even. Overwhelming evidence supports this theory though. (8)

Fossil evidence;

Fossil evidence has clearly shown life had changed overtime. Each fossil has clues on the evolutionary process. There are clues at the cellular level, and the physical level. (9)

Time and space:

Land mass positions are not absolute, and the changes in land positions hint towards evolution due to certian genetic similarities between 2 different beasts. (10)

"Establishing chronologies, both relative and absolute, and geographic change over time are essential for viewing the motion picture that is the history of life on Earth." (10)

Developmental Homologies;

Snakes have legged ancestors. (11) But snakes evolved to no legged creatures. Evolution example. (11)
Also baleen whales have toothed ansestors, another example I evolving. (11)


Based of of probability evolution is correct, vote pro! I await your response. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
http:/ (11)


This talks alot about why evolution and the big bang are FALSE.

Check them out.
Debate Round No. 2


No rebuttal extend arguments.

Also a debate tip: don't put down random links show the arguments then use footnotes to show you got this info from there. I willnot refute links.

Extend arguments

Vote pro


JaredCM forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3


JaredCM forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 4
3 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 3 records.
Posted by 16kadams 4 years ago
Posted by JaredCM 4 years ago
Hi man. :)
Posted by 16kadams 4 years ago
Yay! You accepted :)
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Neonix 4 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Reasons for voting decision: Votebomb. I disagree with Pro, but...."Astronaut even proved what?" Zero conduct, terrible syntax, no arguments and lazy sourcing.....I mean, this is...ugh....votebomb.
Vote Placed by ConservativePolitico 4 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:10 
Reasons for voting decision: ff