The Instigator
ScienceBomb
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
TheFlyingPham
Con (against)
Winning
2 Points

Existence has been scientifically proven

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 2 votes the winner is...
TheFlyingPham
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 12/27/2015 Category: Science
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 484 times Debate No: 84338
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (6)
Votes (2)

 

TheFlyingPham

Con

Existence has not yet been scientifically proven. Existence has only been scientifically theorized. Yes we can observe the cosmos and things around us, and see how they progress, but it is all still just of theory of how they exist with no conclusion.
Debate Round No. 1
ScienceBomb

Pro

ScienceBomb forfeited this round.
TheFlyingPham

Con

My challenger forfeit, vote con
Debate Round No. 2
ScienceBomb

Pro

ScienceBomb forfeited this round.
TheFlyingPham

Con

My opponent forfeits again
Debate Round No. 3
6 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Posted by TranquilSpirit 1 year ago
TranquilSpirit
I don't need science to prove that I exist.
Posted by moneystacker 1 year ago
moneystacker
tbh this topic is so broad it's hard to even argue about really. Also I am for PRo anyway.
Posted by Sssomeone 1 year ago
Sssomeone
To my knowledge one of the only proofs of existence is cogito ergo sum or I think therefore I am. This is philosophical not scientific however.
Posted by Blaz1ng 1 year ago
Blaz1ng
What is your definition of Existence? Would I be arguing that the big bang is not proven or something else? That's what your links seem to convey at least.
Posted by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
Links are not arguments
Posted by SarcasticMethod 1 year ago
SarcasticMethod
What do you think existence means?
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 1 year ago
Midnight1131
ScienceBombTheFlyingPhamTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
ScienceBombTheFlyingPhamTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture