The Instigator
Ishida52134
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Marauder
Con (against)
Winning
21 Points

Exteel sucks

Do you like this debate?NoYes-1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 1/28/2010 Category: Entertainment
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,078 times Debate No: 11000
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (1)
Votes (4)

 

Ishida52134

Pro

Exteel, a game, sucks!
Marauder

Con

No it doesn't. look at this link http://www.exteel.com...

They are robots in this game. With guns. all good things. In order to suck it can not any good things to go in a game.

that's as objective as either of us can approach whether or not this game is good or bad without interference with our own opinion that may be contrary to the truth. If we allow to account for that differing opinions then I would like to point out that it is a easy position to defend that if only one person likes this game, then it does not suck.
Debate Round No. 1
Ishida52134

Pro

Yes, and I am supposed to show how exteel does suck and the cons of it. First of all, I have played exteel before. They have updates like every 3 years? And also, there are many glitchers and hackers inside this game. Next, noobs complain about hackers whenever they die. Finally, just because one person likes the game doesn't make it a good game. In order for the game to be good, it should be able to outdo the other fps games of its category. You can check the rating at www.gameogre.com.
Marauder

Con

Actually, when talking about games, that's all it takes. legitimate joy is holy and pure thing. If a game can instil this is anyone person, then it is counted as good because because it has instilled a holy experience in a individual. C.S. Lewis speaks of how joy, even for something as simple as liking onion soup, can overthrow weeks of progress made by our tempters. That witch is bad and that witch is demonic does not have within its power to make joy. Joy can only come from a source that is good. So even if many do dislike the game, a holy experience was still created, just not in those particular individuals. My opponent complains the game is updated only every 3 years. I have an classic Netindo game called Kirby, its not updated at all and yet I can still find it addictive and fun. that fact that a game is not sufficient to say that it sucks. By the way; I bet the hackers are having fun in the game, or they wouldn't continue to hack, So they prove this game provides joy for some.
Debate Round No. 2
Ishida52134

Pro

O so you're saying that all debates are wrong right since every debate is based on opinions. So I say murdering someone is good because some people find joy in murdering right?
Marauder

Con

When discousing games they are no other factors or variables to consider beyond enjoyment. that is all they are for. thats why we catorgorize it under entertainment in the discousion forums.
In murder more comes into play than a persons enjoyment. They are a great many topics to be discoused and debated that are not related to entertainment. Murder is one of those.

By the way, your grammar in the first sentance is confusing; '...all debates are wrong right since every...'

Vote Con! cause at bear minimum pro did not prove for certain his position.
Debate Round No. 3
1 comment has been posted on this debate.
Posted by Marauder 7 years ago
Marauder
stupid 1,000 character limit.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by I-am-a-panda 7 years ago
I-am-a-panda
Ishida52134MarauderTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:00 
Vote Placed by jetbey 7 years ago
jetbey
Ishida52134MarauderTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Grape 7 years ago
Grape
Ishida52134MarauderTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Koopin 7 years ago
Koopin
Ishida52134MarauderTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07