The Instigator
popcornfreaq
Pro (for)
Losing
1 Points
The Contender
Deathbeforedishonour
Con (against)
Winning
11 Points

Facebook is Dangerous for kids

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 4 votes the winner is...
Deathbeforedishonour
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 6/7/2011 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 1,718 times Debate No: 16927
Debate Rounds (1)
Comments (2)
Votes (4)

 

popcornfreaq

Pro

There could be predators out there who could convince you to meet up and take you away and traffick you.
Deathbeforedishonour

Con

My opponent says that facebook is unsafe, because preditors can talk you into meeting them and kidnap you and traffic you. I respectfully disagree. My next contentions will show why my opponent is wrong.

C1: Facebook is safe because it has privacy settings that will allow the usr to keep certain info hiden.

C2: The user must accept friend requests, so if someone if the user doesn't know a person on a friend request then they can deny the friend request.

In conclusion, Facebook is completely safe, unless the user doesn't follow one of the rules many of us have been taught since we can understand english. 'Do not talk to strangers'.
Debate Round No. 1
2 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Posted by Deathbeforedishonour 5 years ago
Deathbeforedishonour
Hah I know right? I just took it because I had nothing else to do.
Posted by izbo10 5 years ago
izbo10
was this even a debate, Im sorry but neither side got past basic intros to their positions.
4 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 4 records.
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 5 years ago
Cliff.Stamp
popcornfreaqDeathbeforedishonourTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:12 
Reasons for voting decision: One sided debate, 2:1 for Con who made just a slight but more effort. It is an interesting topic however and deserves more than a driveby.
Vote Placed by BlackVoid 5 years ago
BlackVoid
popcornfreaqDeathbeforedishonourTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Yeah...
Vote Placed by Ore_Ele 5 years ago
Ore_Ele
popcornfreaqDeathbeforedishonourTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Likely spam debate, many one rounders are. There isn't really much other than arguments to vote on.
Vote Placed by Andromeda_Z 5 years ago
Andromeda_Z
popcornfreaqDeathbeforedishonourTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: Conduct tied, neither was rude or forfeited. S/G tied, no obvious errors from either side. Arguments to Con, he refuted Pro's arguments while Pro had BOP. Sources tied, neither used sources.