Fact: 2+2=4
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 10 votes the winner is...
ishallannoyyo
Voting Style:  Open  Point System:  7 Point  
Started:  9/21/2012  Category:  Education  
Updated:  5 years ago  Status:  Post Voting Period  
Viewed:  2,328 times  Debate No:  25744 
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (8)
Votes (10)
Someone has creating an Ishall2 (Airmax can do an IP check, it isn't me). I am severly insulted. Let us begin this debate on whether or not 2 + 2 = 4. 

Let a & b each be equal to 1. Since a ^ b are equal,
b^2 = ab ...(eq.1) Since a equals itself, it is obvious that a^2 = a^2 ...(eq.2) Subtract equation 1 from equation 2. This yeilds (a^2)  (b^2) = (a^2)ab ...(eq. 3) We can factor both sides of the equation; (a^2)ab equals a(ab). Likewise, (a^2)(b^2) equals (a + b)(a  b) (Nothing fishy is going on here. Ths statement is perfectly true. Plug in numbers and see for yourself!) Substituting into the equation 3 , we get (a+b)(ab) = a (ab) ...(eq.5) So far, so good. Now divide both sides of the equation by (ab) and we get a + b = a ...(eq.5) b = 0 ...(eq.6) But we set b to 1 at the very beginning of this proof, so this means that 1 = 0 ...(eq.7) ...Anyways, getting that far gives us the jist of the proof, later in the proof, Charles Seife goes on to prove that Winston Churchill was a carrot! if you want to know how that is possible, I recommend you read the book. From equation 7, add a number to either side and get it equal to any other number, one greater than itself. Multiplying equation 7 after adding to it, and one can get: any number is equal to any other number. Therefore 2+2 is 5. This is all under the assumption that "a" and "b" are equal, which they clearly cannot be as they are different variables. x cannot equal y, they are different variables. Each variable denotes a specific number. Why then would there be "a" and "b"? Why not just "a" as there is no difference between "a" and "b"? This is like saying 4 = 5, clearly incorrect. Easy vote CON (as this is a troll debate and my opponent's math was severely flawed) 
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by RonPaul 5 years ago
ISHALLANNOYYO2  ishallannoyyo  Tied  

Agreed with before the debate:      0 points  
Agreed with after the debate:      0 points  
Who had better conduct:      1 point  
Had better spelling and grammar:      1 point  
Made more convincing arguments:      3 points  
Used the most reliable sources:      2 points  
Total points awarded:  0  5 
Reasons for voting decision: Wtf is with all the votebombs?
Vote Placed by MouthWash 5 years ago
ISHALLANNOYYO2  ishallannoyyo  Tied  

Agreed with before the debate:      0 points  
Agreed with after the debate:      0 points  
Who had better conduct:      1 point  
Had better spelling and grammar:      1 point  
Made more convincing arguments:      3 points  
Used the most reliable sources:      2 points  
Total points awarded:  0  5 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro divided by zero. He trolled.
Vote Placed by THEBOMB 5 years ago
ISHALLANNOYYO2  ishallannoyyo  Tied  

Agreed with before the debate:      0 points  
Agreed with after the debate:      0 points  
Who had better conduct:      1 point  
Had better spelling and grammar:      1 point  
Made more convincing arguments:      3 points  
Used the most reliable sources:      2 points  
Total points awarded:  7  0 
Reasons for voting decision: Despite the fact that CON's math was flawed, PRO never showed how CON's math was flawed. All he did was say that a =/= b without providing any reason for that justification. All PRO does is ask questions which are never answered and do not take the place of variables. Therefore, ever so reluctantly, I must vote CON since their arguments stood until the end. And PRO never provided any reasoning behind their arguments....:/ And to counteract the VBs....
Vote Placed by 16kadams 5 years ago
ISHALLANNOYYO2  ishallannoyyo  Tied  

Agreed with before the debate:      0 points  
Agreed with after the debate:      0 points  
Who had better conduct:      1 point  
Had better spelling and grammar:      1 point  
Made more convincing arguments:      3 points  
Used the most reliable sources:      2 points  
Total points awarded:  0  0 
Reasons for voting decision: ghjk
Vote Placed by phantom 5 years ago
ISHALLANNOYYO2  ishallannoyyo  Tied  

Agreed with before the debate:      0 points  
Agreed with after the debate:      0 points  
Who had better conduct:      1 point  
Had better spelling and grammar:      1 point  
Made more convincing arguments:      3 points  
Used the most reliable sources:      2 points  
Total points awarded:  3  0 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro did not refute cons argument nor make any of his own. There is no mathematical rule that says two variables have to be different. (Why is everyone vbombing?)
Vote Placed by lannan13 5 years ago
ISHALLANNOYYO2  ishallannoyyo  Tied  

Agreed with before the debate:      0 points  
Agreed with after the debate:      0 points  
Who had better conduct:      1 point  
Had better spelling and grammar:      1 point  
Made more convincing arguments:      3 points  
Used the most reliable sources:      2 points  
Total points awarded:  0  5 
Reasons for voting decision: Con trolled the debate
Vote Placed by TUF 5 years ago
ISHALLANNOYYO2  ishallannoyyo  Tied  

Agreed with before the debate:      0 points  
Agreed with after the debate:      0 points  
Who had better conduct:      1 point  
Had better spelling and grammar:      1 point  
Made more convincing arguments:      3 points  
Used the most reliable sources:      2 points  
Total points awarded:  0  4 
Reasons for voting decision: Con trolled, and his math was flawed.
Vote Placed by AlwaysMoreThanYou 5 years ago
ISHALLANNOYYO2  ishallannoyyo  Tied  

Agreed with before the debate:      0 points  
Agreed with after the debate:      0 points  
Who had better conduct:      1 point  
Had better spelling and grammar:      1 point  
Made more convincing arguments:      3 points  
Used the most reliable sources:      2 points  
Total points awarded:  0  0 
Reasons for voting decision: Con's argument made no sense, although Pro blatantly divided by zero. Arguments to no one, because neither of them was convincing.
Vote Placed by Jacob_Apologist 5 years ago
ISHALLANNOYYO2  ishallannoyyo  Tied  

Agreed with before the debate:      0 points  
Agreed with after the debate:      0 points  
Who had better conduct:      1 point  
Had better spelling and grammar:      1 point  
Made more convincing arguments:      3 points  
Used the most reliable sources:      2 points  
Total points awarded:  0  5 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro could use easy argument
Vote Placed by AznWords 5 years ago
ISHALLANNOYYO2  ishallannoyyo  Tied  

Agreed with before the debate:      0 points  
Agreed with after the debate:      0 points  
Who had better conduct:      1 point  
Had better spelling and grammar:      1 point  
Made more convincing arguments:      3 points  
Used the most reliable sources:      2 points  
Total points awarded:  5  0 
Reasons for voting decision: Con brought up such a give away debate but Pro simply threw it away. Cons mathematical fallacy is quite an easy fix. Since this is an essentially 1 round argument I have to evaluate based on the last round. Even though Con is wrong, he is not overtly wrong while pro appears not to understand math very well. What Pro has stated is a blatant misunderstanding of math. There is no mathematical convention that restricts two variables from equaling and pro has not given reason for this restriction.
: So far, so good. Now divide both sides of the equation by (ab) and we get
: a + b = a
You can't divide by zero, (ab)=(11)=0 . This step is illegal. It's like when people say 2/0=0, therefore, 0*0=6. Sorry if this ruined the debate for you AznWords.
To Pro: a can equal b unless otherwise stated. Also: a & b in this context are given as constants not variables.