The Instigator
Annbella
Con (against)
Losing
16 Points
The Contender
I-am-a-panda
Pro (for)
Winning
49 Points

Fakes

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Con Tied Pro
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/2/2009 Category: Education
Updated: 7 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 6,733 times Debate No: 9913
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (25)
Votes (10)

 

Annbella

Con

http://3.bp.blogspot.com...

this chick is on Debate but i found this pic on google!!!! can someone say FAKE!!!
I-am-a-panda

Pro

Due to my opponents stance, I'm going to presume I have to affirm that user is not a fake, and is not using someone else's photo as her own.

Nonetheless, the debater she is referring to is "Asiandebater" and the photo she is referring to is located here on her profile: http://www.debate.org...

This user has several more photo's of herself located here: http://www.debate.org... and here: http://www.debate.org...

It is obvious that these photos, from her profile, bear a striking resemblance to the original: http://www.debate.org... and http://www.debate.org...

Furthermore, my opponent has not shown the source of her photo, and could indeed be from this users blog or indeed be a photo of her put on a website.

Back to my opponent.
Debate Round No. 1
Annbella

Con

If you look at the pictures on her album and look at her second album they look nothing alike!
If you want more proof then you should go look at this picture and look at the eye color there brown http://www.debate.org... and then look at this picture and they are a dark Green in the second one http://www.debate.org.... Also look at there eyebrows they are shaped different in each picture. It's clear that those are four different PRETTY but different girl off the internet. If you want more proof you should go on Google and look up Scene Girls. http://images.google.com...
I-am-a-panda

Pro

===CON===

"If you look at the pictures on her album and look at her second album they look nothing alike!
If you want more proof then you should go look at this picture and look at the eye color there brown http://www.debate.org...... and then look at this picture and they are a dark Green in the second one http://www.debate.org....... Also look at there eyebrows they are shaped different in each picture. It's clear that those are four different PRETTY but different girl off the internet. If you want more proof you should go on Google and look up Scene Girls. http://images.google.com...... "

===REBUTTAL===

1) The links my opponent has given are the exact same, and have no difference whatsoever.

2) What evidence can my opponent produce that my opponent is not, in fact, working for scene girls?
Debate Round No. 2
Annbella

Con

~~~~~~PRO~~~~~~
1) The links my opponent has given are the exact same, and have no difference whatsoever.
~~~~~~REBUTTAL~~~~~~

1. My computer messed up i ment to put picture of that girl up and i guess that it didn't. and since i guess that you havn't looked at the pictures then just try these links and see if it works and if they don't work then just go to her profile and look them up. It is the album that is called "me!!!!!" then go to the first picture and look at her eye they are brown. then after you look at the first piture look at the last picture in that ablum and look at her eyes they are Dark green.

Here are the links to those pictures. (I hope that they work)

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org...
____________________________________________________________________________________________

~~~~~~PRO~~~~~~
2) What evidence can my opponent produce that my opponent is not, in fact, working for scene girls?

~~~~~~REBUTTAL~~~~~~

2.That makes no since at all.
I-am-a-panda

Pro

I thank my opponent for this debate.

== CON ==

"My computer messed up i ment to put picture of that girl up and i guess that it didn't. and since i guess that you havn't looked at the pictures then just try these links and see if it works and if they don't work then just go to her profile and look them up. It is the album that is called "me!!!!!" then go to the first picture and look at her eye they are brown. then after you look at the first piture look at the last picture in that ablum and look at her eyes they are Dark green.

Here are the links to those pictures. (I hope that they work)

http://www.debate.org...

http://www.debate.org... "

== REBUTTAL ==

While it is indeed visible that in the first picture her eyes are brown, the eye colour is not easily visible in the second picture and, from my perspective looks, brown. Because of the poor quality of the image, no conclusion on the eye colour can be made.

== CON ==

"That makes no since at all."

== REBUTTAL ==

That sentence actually makes much less sense. Although it's irrelevant at this stage, I was merely asking how you can disprove she in fact works for Scenegirls.

== CONCLUSION ==

My opponent has not proven conclusively that the girl in the aforementioned photographs is not the user Asiandebater.
Debate Round No. 3
25 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by lexa 6 years ago
lexa
One is BROOKELLE BONES and the other is JULIE ELIZABETH don't believe me? look them up
Posted by Misuzu 6 years ago
Misuzu
I actually happen to know she is 100% fake.
One of those is Brokelle bones an infomase scene queen and the other one I dont know.
Brokelle bones is commonly faked shes 20 right now and no longer has any web pages do to bordom/fakes. She is no longer a scene queen either.
Posted by Annbella 7 years ago
Annbella
You guys can think what you want.
But i know that she is a fake. and that is what i have to say!
Posted by MasterDebaterMK 7 years ago
MasterDebaterMK
And its common sense that she's fake I meant to add.
Posted by MasterDebaterMK 7 years ago
MasterDebaterMK
Yeah, I realized your arguments are better, Panda. I was just hoping she would win because like Nags said, this was an easy win for her.
Posted by Xer 7 years ago
Xer
No. She just alerted me to the theory that asiandebater is fake. Panda had good enough responses to negate the resolution. There were many more contentions and rebuttals that Annbella could've used, which she didn't, which is why I gave args to Panda.
Posted by Cody_Franklin 7 years ago
Cody_Franklin
If she convinced you that asiandebater was indeed a fake, would arguments not also go to Con, then?
Posted by Xer 7 years ago
Xer
This was such an easy debate for Annbella to win. Panda somehow won it though. S&G and Args to Pro, Conduct and Sources tied. Annbella however did convince me that asiandebater is a fake.
Posted by I-am-a-panda 7 years ago
I-am-a-panda
It doesn't matter if she is or isn't, the majority think she is real based on my argument vs. Annbellas
Posted by MasterDebaterMK 7 years ago
MasterDebaterMK
Wow, I was hoping for a better result for Annbella. Obviously shes a fake.
10 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Vote Placed by Annbella 6 years ago
Annbella
AnnbellaI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by I-am-a-panda 6 years ago
I-am-a-panda
AnnbellaI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Vote Placed by MasterDebaterMK 7 years ago
MasterDebaterMK
AnnbellaI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:25 
Vote Placed by TigerFB21 7 years ago
TigerFB21
AnnbellaI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by tombomb25 7 years ago
tombomb25
AnnbellaI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:06 
Vote Placed by VoodooChild 7 years ago
VoodooChild
AnnbellaI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Pogosama 7 years ago
Pogosama
AnnbellaI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by Nails 7 years ago
Nails
AnnbellaI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Vote Placed by wonderwoman 7 years ago
wonderwoman
AnnbellaI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:Vote Checkmark--1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:Vote Checkmark--2 points
Total points awarded:70 
Vote Placed by Alexby1 7 years ago
Alexby1
AnnbellaI-am-a-pandaTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05