The Instigator
ho11yw00d
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
Wylted
Con (against)
Winning
15 Points

Fast debate, quick replies, no sources. Better or worse?

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 6 votes the winner is...
Wylted
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 2/2/2016 Category: Miscellaneous
Updated: 1 year ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 672 times Debate No: 85964
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (12)
Votes (6)

 

ho11yw00d

Pro

Fast debates - Pro

Long debates - Con
Wylted

Con

Long debates when referring to time allows you to have more time to research your opponent's premises and give better referrals, as well as provide vetter argumebtation due to time spent researching as well.

If talking about length, then it allows you to touch on more complicated subjects and provide more premises which are better explained. It gives the debaters more ability to persuade.

Note:debate is 5 minutes 500 character
Debate Round No. 1
ho11yw00d

Pro

ho11yw00d forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 2
ho11yw00d

Pro

ho11yw00d forfeited this round.
Debate Round No. 3
12 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 10 records.
Posted by Wylted 1 year ago
Wylted
You're an idiot for making a 5 minute debate if you planned on taking your eyes off the screen before canceling it. That was horrible strategy MisslowIQ
Posted by ho11yw00d 1 year ago
ho11yw00d
Hey moron, I made the debate at 11am, by 5pm I forgot all about it. Like it said, I don't stare at the screen all day and night like a stalker, like you apparently do. Like losing a debate on this is somehow going to destroy my life or something.

Get a life dude.
Posted by Wylted 1 year ago
Wylted
It's actually the second before you get up, you cancel the debate. Anyone with an IQ above 65 would do that before calling it a night, especially on a debate with 5 minute rounds
Posted by Reformist 1 year ago
Reformist
Ho11wood

Stop being so insulting
Posted by ho11yw00d 1 year ago
ho11yw00d
Yeah, because before I go to bed at night, I lock the doors, brush my teeth, turn the lights off and most importantly, make sure all of my debates are up to date on a debate website.

You F-ing idiot. I don't loose any sleep thinking about this site like you apparently do.
Posted by Wylted 1 year ago
Wylted
It's idiotic not to cancel it before you pack it up for the night
Posted by ho11yw00d 1 year ago
ho11yw00d
FYI

I did not forfeit. I was trying to do this quick debate yesterday but it was not accepted until last night after I already packed it in. I will setup another one later. The whole point of the debate was to get it done quick.
Posted by ho11yw00d 1 year ago
ho11yw00d
Go away Reformist!! Stop stalking me, you weirdo. Do you seriously follow me around on every debate and have to comment on everything? Is your life that dull?
Posted by Reformist 1 year ago
Reformist
Ho11w00d is just mad because he got votes removed from our debate.

He threatned to report Whiteflame for taking votes away

:-)

Keep thinking about it

:-)
Posted by ho11yw00d 1 year ago
ho11yw00d
I accept your challenge then?
6 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 6 records.
Vote Placed by ssadi 1 year ago
ssadi
ho11yw00dWyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF!
Vote Placed by diarrhea_of_a_wimpy_kid 1 year ago
diarrhea_of_a_wimpy_kid
ho11yw00dWyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con edge in conduct for actually showing up. Con made the only arguments, although not necessarily "convincing". Allowance made for lack of counter argument requiring further explanation of initial ideas. The debate may have been fast, but it wasn't better than a long one.
Vote Placed by Midnight1131 1 year ago
Midnight1131
ho11yw00dWyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: FF
Vote Placed by lannan13 1 year ago
lannan13
ho11yw00dWyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Forfeiture
Vote Placed by dsjpk5 1 year ago
dsjpk5
ho11yw00dWyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro ff many times, so conduct to Con. Con also was the only one who made an argument, so arguments to Con by default.
Vote Placed by Hayd 1 year ago
Hayd
ho11yw00dWyltedTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Con is the only one to make arguments, which are completely dropped by Pro. Thus, Con wins by defeault. Pro ff debate, so conduct to Con.