The Instigator
Pro (for)
3 Points
The Contender
Con (against)
3 Points

Female orphans deserve to be there.

Do you like this debate?NoYes+1
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Vote Here
Pro Tied Con
Who did you agree with before the debate?
Who did you agree with after the debate?
Who had better conduct?
Who had better spelling and grammar?
Who made more convincing arguments?
Who used the most reliable sources?
Reasons for your voting decision - Required
1,000 Characters Remaining
The voting period for this debate does not end.
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 5/10/2011 Category: Economics
Updated: 5 years ago Status: Voting Period
Viewed: 1,124 times Debate No: 16400
Debate Rounds (3)
Comments (5)
Votes (2)




They should have been in that kitchen. Honestly I don't understand why it is so hard to comprehend.
Step 1: Go to Kitchen
Step 2: make sandwich
rinse and repeat


This is my first debate, and I thank Potatolover for sharing this moment with me.

Female orphans are a vital part of our society- they sweep our chimneys, make our sandwiches, and even star in movies about being a female orphan AND an ginger. But, in regards to female orphans deserving their place, is 'there' really the best place?

The answer is no.

While men require sandwiches to eat, they also need energy to power their man machines. Solution? Put female orphans in coal mines forever.
Debate Round No. 1


I can see your argument and the logic behind it.
A few things though:
1. If you gut the female orphans into the coal mines,where is the kitchen?
They cannot do their job with the kitchen and therefore cannot be put into the coal mines.
2. The coal mines are small on space and female orphans are very tender and cannot feed the men in that type of environment
3. With that being said we will run out of female orphans and according to you they are needed therefore your argument would eliminate them


I understand where you are coming from, but you seem to misunderstand what a female orphan's true purpose is. The reason females become orphaned is because we already have women in the kitchen, and 100% of men prefer their women to be experienced in sandwich making. Orphans would not have regular access to kitchens, and would therefore be inferior to the more recent model of women.Female orphans are the unwanted child of today's world. The mines can grow larger, and orphans will have a purpose.
Debate Round No. 2


Ok I see some logic in that.
A few points though
The fact that the orphans are in an orphanage at the moment means that they are being taught how to make sandwiches and become very experienced in sandwich making.
Here is a link to what they are being taught
This document though shows why the female orphans should stay where they belong
Thanks for your time today!


History shall repeat itself, despite the fact that no girls worked in here.

And I wouldn't trust an orphan to make me a big ol' hoagie. Women just don't understand hoagies.

Nah, I concede with my arguments. I honestly don't care where female orphans are working... as long as they are overworking and making less money than I do.
Debate Round No. 3
5 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Posted by Amveller 5 years ago
I had two tie the vote you both
Posted by bigpoppajustice 5 years ago
Yeah, this was enjoyable. Had a few good chuckles.
Posted by potatolover 5 years ago
Well That was fun!
Any other random and fun debates anyone wants to have, tell me.
Posted by zach12 5 years ago
solid debate
Posted by bigpoppajustice 5 years ago
*a ginger. Wow, way to be there when I need you grammar.
2 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 2 records.
Vote Placed by Amveller 5 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:Vote Checkmark--3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:32 
Reasons for voting decision: lol
Vote Placed by Cliff.Stamp 5 years ago
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:--Vote Checkmark3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:01 
Reasons for voting decision: Con was overall funnier, 1 pt. However he did not do the Busey justice.