The Instigator
Billyf6
Pro (for)
Losing
0 Points
The Contender
kasmic
Con (against)
Winning
24 Points

Feminism killed Chivalry

Do you like this debate?NoYes+0
Add this debate to Google Add this debate to Delicious Add this debate to FaceBook Add this debate to Digg  
Post Voting Period
The voting period for this debate has ended.
after 5 votes the winner is...
kasmic
Voting Style: Open Point System: 7 Point
Started: 11/12/2014 Category: People
Updated: 2 years ago Status: Post Voting Period
Viewed: 909 times Debate No: 65034
Debate Rounds (2)
Comments (9)
Votes (5)

 

Billyf6

Pro

Chivalry is dead because feminism killed it. Women want a man to show them chivalry, but yet get mad when men mention it because they claim they can do everything on their own
kasmic

Con

Thanks for the debate.

Burden of proof on Pro.

Pro must prove that "Feminism killed Chivalry."

In order to do that he must prove that

1: Chivalry lived, or is capable of living.

2: Chivalry died.

3: Feminism is directly responsible.

Quite the burden to prove. Good luck to pro.

As such Pro has not filled this burden of proof, therefore the resolution has no support.
Debate Round No. 1
Billyf6

Pro

well then i guess we have to fight
(#91; V4;" V3;لV0; V5;")#91;
kasmic

Con

Pro has not proven that chilvary could live, let alone die. Pro has not shown that in the event that chivalry died that feminism would be responsible... Ergo the resolution is negated.
Debate Round No. 2
9 comments have been posted on this debate. Showing 1 through 9 records.
Posted by debate_power 2 years ago
debate_power
I like this one
Posted by Mr.Lee 2 years ago
Mr.Lee
I enjoyed it! It seems like I've finally found an intellectual niche on this site. All the rest are interior, to be honest.
Posted by kasmic 2 years ago
kasmic
I did just finish a debate on a similar topic. http://www.debate.org...
Posted by Mr.Lee 2 years ago
Mr.Lee
You should start one! I wouldn't accept, because I really don't have a firm grasp on it.
Posted by kasmic 2 years ago
kasmic
I would be happy to have a real debate on this topic with someone.
Posted by Mr.Lee 2 years ago
Mr.Lee
This had the potential to be an interesting debate. Sadly, I've been let down.
Posted by Beginner 2 years ago
Beginner
That was pretty cheap. ;)
Posted by kasmic 2 years ago
kasmic
Trust me I did not take this seriously lol! I got a good laugh though.
Posted by Billyf6 2 years ago
Billyf6
can i report the con for taking this too seriously like dude calm
5 votes have been placed for this debate. Showing 1 through 5 records.
Vote Placed by debate_power 2 years ago
debate_power
Billyf6kasmicTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: Only two rounds? Anyway, Con's position was never really approached, let alone compromised, in this debate. Con had better spelling and grammar. If you look at the arguments, it's a no-brainer- the burden of proof was met easily by Con.
Vote Placed by Mr.Lincoln 2 years ago
Mr.Lincoln
Billyf6kasmicTied
Agreed with before the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Agreed with after the debate:-Vote Checkmark-0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:-Vote Checkmark-2 points
Total points awarded:07 
Reasons for voting decision: Pros conduct in 2nd round was child like. All points to Con
Vote Placed by Mr.Lee 2 years ago
Mr.Lee
Billyf6kasmicTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:05 
Reasons for voting decision: This was extremely disappointing. Please do an actual debate on this topic, Con, because it is actually a current issue.
Vote Placed by 9spaceking 2 years ago
9spaceking
Billyf6kasmicTied
Agreed with before the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Agreed with after the debate:--Vote Checkmark0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:03 
Reasons for voting decision: pro completely failed to fulfill the resolution
Vote Placed by lannan13 2 years ago
lannan13
Billyf6kasmicTied
Agreed with before the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Agreed with after the debate:Vote Checkmark--0 points
Who had better conduct:--Vote Checkmark1 point
Had better spelling and grammar:-Vote Checkmark-1 point
Made more convincing arguments:-Vote Checkmark-3 points
Used the most reliable sources:--Vote Checkmark2 points
Total points awarded:04 
Reasons for voting decision: Pro couldn't meet BOP and didn't fully refute Con. Pro also had major grammatical errors.