Feminists are being intellectually dishonest when arguing about the existence of a "gender pay gap".
Debate Rounds (3)
I look forward to having this debate.
"The "77 cents" formulation is a colloquialism"shorthand for expressing a complex economic truth. Simply put, what it conveys is the fact that, if you average out what all women, working full time, year round, earn and compare that number to what all men working full time, year round, earn, you find that women take home 77 percent of what men do." - Sarah Jane Glynn Center for American Progress
The statistics used to "prove" the gender pay gap is incredibly misleading. The Department of Labor's study does not break down which professions these racial/gender groups belong too, their positions, or longevity of their respective careers. Because a senior engineer who has worked for Lockheed Martin for 15 years, logically is going to make more than a clinical social worker working for a DCF for 2 years. Both are white collar positions, while the pay is going to be significantly different.
The Consad report worked in those controls, among others, and found that the pay gap narrows to 93%-95%. Giving credence to the fact that the 77% wage is a result of the different choices women make in their careers and raising families. Engineers simply make more money than social workers and the grand majority of those majoring in gender studies. Any difference in wages of similar men and women of equality qualifications is explained by women's avoidance in salary negotiations, as told by the National Bureau of Economic Research.
There is not a supreme patriarchy conspiring to artificially hold women's wages down and oppressing them.
You are likely going to surmise that because of your mother's experience, that a gender pay gap exists. That is going to be pure conjecture, and very hard to authenticate. That individual experience is not indicative or prove a systemic problem.
The median (median) earner is more important than the mean (average) of all workers, because almost all executives in almost all businesses are males. These males would skew the results of a mean (average) of all workers based on gender.
The Consad Report is extremely bias (right of center). I contest that Pro is being intellectually dishonest in his/her assertions of the wage gap specifically by using an extremely bias source. (It would be like me calling a report from Salon.com moderate and fair).
You say that the CONSAD report is inherently biased, without giving any proof for that argument. The first paragraph below the mission statement of The Institute for Women"s Policy Research, the source you cited, explicitly says their goal is to "address the needs of women" and "use women-oriented policy research" . As a result, their report is inherently biased because they have a vested interest in its results. That is intellectual dishonesty. Even after reading their report, they still did not break wages down by earnings of men and women in the same industry. But it did break down the amount of women in the industry, versus men. Which could imply that they had the data that broke gender wages down, by industry. They simply could have chosen not to publish that information because it would have blown Meteor Crater-sized holes in their research. Though that is pure conjecture, based on the facts at hand. In the end, they simply used men and women's full-time wages. Which is disingenuous and obviously is not painting the whole picture.
To address your first paragraph, the choices women make cause them to earn less. Let's examine two industries, engineering and education. Women earned 18% of the engineering degrees and 81% of the education degrees, in 2008 . Average earnings of those in engineering is $48493 and the average earnings of education is $33180 . Now because women earn fewer engineering degrees and earn more of the education degrees. The women's wage median is going to be deflated because most of the earnings within the data are going to be inherently lower because of the fields women chose to go in to. This same study also goes in to other factors such as number of hours worked & jobs worked within an industry. A 3rd of the wage gap is "unexplained", but is explained by fact that women do not negotiate their salaries .
No discrimination in STEM hiring either, which has in inherently higher wages than most other industries. Women are hired 2 to 1 against identically qualified men. 
Vote Pro, because Con seems more interested in using conjecture, than proving my points wrong using facts. I will admit that citing Sarah Jane Glynn's paragraph was a mischaracterization of the method in which the Department of Labor disseminated its data. Saying they used mean, instead of median. Regardless, my points are valid. The wage gap is a result of women's choices in degrees and ensuing careers, not institutional sexism driving women's wages down.
Pro states: "Even after reading their report, they still did not break wages down by earnings of men and women in the same industry." p. 30
Pro: "In the end, they simply used men and women's full-time wages. Which is disingenuous and obviously is not painting the whole picture." p. 26
Pro: "Now because women earn fewer engineering degrees and earn more of the education degrees. The women's wage median is going to be deflated because most of the earnings within the data are going to be inherently lower because of the fields women chose to go in to." In engineering, women compose 26% of the workforce and earn 82% of men. In education, women compose 74% of the workforce and earn 79% of men .
Pro: "A 3rd of the wage gap is "unexplained", but is explained by fact that women do not negotiate their salaries ." " "the authors' findings appear to be consistent with past research suggesting that women are at least as likely to negotiate as men when face-to-face communication with other parties is limited." " disproven by Pro"s own link .
Pro contests STEM has no wage discrimination by analyzing college professors. When we analyze actual employees of STEM, we find a roughly 18% wage gap between men and women .
The US DOL has a myth and fact page. "Myth: the wage gap is much smaller than 77%. Fact: wage gap based on annual earnings is 77%" . "The wage gap varies considerably across occupations" occupational segregation, just like wage discrimination, is an issue of inequality" . "When women are not paid fairly, not only do they suffer, but so do their families" .
Feminism positions are in line with the US Department of Labor. The US Department of Labor data is not dishonest, therefore feminism positions are not dishonest.
No votes have been placed for this debate.
You are not eligible to vote on this debate
This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges.